2
3 Comments

I built an app for my kid. Turns out the "fix" I assumed was wrong.

My kid knew exactly what needed to be done. Homework, chores, whatever — they could tell you the steps, in order, no confusion. And still, most days, nothing happened. Not defiance, not laziness. Just... stuck.

My first instinct was the same one every productivity app ships with: better organization. A clearer list. A visual schedule. Break it into steps, write it down, make it visible.

It didn't help. If anything, it made things worse. Seeing everything laid out — five steps, ten steps, the whole shape of the task — seemed to be the thing that froze them, not the lack of a plan.

So I stripped it down to almost nothing. Instead of a list, one step. Just one. Not "here's your homework broken into 6 parts" — just "open the notebook." Nothing about what comes after. When that's done, the next one shows up. Never before.

That's the entire product, really. Hindigo doesn't manage tasks. It hides all of them except the one you're allowed to do right now.

A few things I didn't expect going in:

  • The instinct to add visibility back (a progress bar, a "steps remaining" counter, anything) shows up constantly, and every time it's tempting because it sounds like an improvement. It isn't, for this specific problem.

  • This wasn't unique to my kid. Adults with the same "I know what to do and still can't start" pattern — a lot of it overlaps with ADHD, but not exclusively — react the same way to the one-step approach.

  • The hardest part of building this hasn't been the tech. It's been refusing, repeatedly, to add the features that would make it a normal to-do app again.

It's still early — closed beta, Android only right now. But it started from watching one specific kid get stuck, not from a market gap I spotted on a spreadsheet, and I think that's the only reason the constraint has held this long.

posted toAvatar for product Hindigo
Hindigo
  1. 1

    I like that you changed your understanding of the problem instead of trying to improve the original solution.

    I'll be interested to see which moments users consistently describe as helping them get unstuck. Those patterns will probably reveal whether the product is really reducing cognitive load, lowering activation friction, or something even more fundamental.

    1. 1
      Sorry for the slow reply, Aryan The clearest signal I have so far is a negative one, and it's in the post. A well-structured six-step list should reduce cognitive load — that's what structure is for. It didn't. It made things worse. So whatever is costing them, it isn't information about what to do. They had that already. My working read is that the cost is anticipation rather than load. Not holding the steps in mind, but contemplating them. That would explain why one step works despite carrying strictly less information: there's nothing after it to weigh. The useful part is that this is falsifiable. A "3 steps remaining" counter adds almost no informational load. If the problem is cognitive load, adding it should be neutral. If the problem is anticipation, it should break the effect outright. Same feature, opposite predictions. That's the test I want to run once there are enough users for the answer to mean anything. I'll come back here with what it shows.
      1. 1
        That’s an interesting shift in the problem. I’d be interested in continuing the conversation beyond the thread — would you be open to sharing the best email to reach you on?