I built an honest job-application copilot because the AI resume tools all either lie or sound like robots

The anti-hallucination guard is the right thing to bet the product on — and the technical detail about diffing against the source and only flagging new concrete claims (numbers, employers, tools) is exactly the kind of specificity that builds trust. I’d put that mechanic front and center on the landing page, not buried in a launch post.

On the positioning question: “never invents” is good but it’s a negative claim — it tells me what you won’t do. The stronger frame might be something like “shows your real experience in its best light” — same guarantee, but it sells the outcome instead of the guardrail.

One thing I’m curious about: the ghosting tracker + auto-flag feels like a sleeper feature that could drive a lot of word of mouth on its own, especially right now. Are you leaning into that at all in your marketing, or keeping the resume tailoring as the main hook?

I think “honest job copilot” is directionally right, but it may be a little too moral as the main promise.

The sharper pain is probably more practical:

“I need to tailor my resume without creating claims I can’t defend in an interview.”

That is the real fear your product solves. People do not just worry that AI will lie. They worry it will make them look better on paper and then expose them later when a recruiter asks for specifics.

So I’d frame HiredCopilot less like an ethical AI resume tool and more like interview-safe resume tailoring.

That gives the anti-hallucination guard a much clearer reason to exist.

Happy to put the cleaner landing page angle in writing if useful. There is a strong positioning layer here, but I would not try to solve the whole page inside a comment.