I built an SEO tool that gives you the actual fix, not just the problem. Looking for brutal feedback.
I got mass-frustrated with SEO tools that say "add FAQ schema" and leave you to figure out the rest.
So I built Rankture — an SEO audit that turns findings into copy-pasteable fixes.
How it works:
Crawl your site, flag issues (the usual)
But then: generate the actual code/content to fix it
Example: instead of "add FAQ schema," you get the JSON-LD with your real PAA questions pre-filled. Copy into <head>. Done.
Also built in:
Content optimizer — compares your page vs top 10 SERP results, shows exactly what to add
AI visibility checker — see if ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude mention your brand (this is becoming a thing)
Wikipedia/Wikidata check — turns out LLMs pull heavily from these
What I've learned so far:
People don't want more dashboards. They want a next step they can ship in 10 minutes.
"Copy-paste the fix" gets way more interest than "here's your score"
AI visibility tracking is hot but everyone's building the same monitoring tool. The gap is: what do you DO about it?
Questions for you:
Does "execution-first SEO" resonate, or do you actually want the deep data?
If you could push one button and have ONE SEO thing just... done... what would it be?
Looking forward to your feedback!
Would you use an AI co‑pilot that turns your startup idea into an execution roadmap?
The "Full Stack" Dev is dead. Long live the "Code + Media" Stack.
This resonates a lot. I’ve noticed that many tools surface problems but stop short of enforcement or real fixes because that’s where complexity lives. Curious — what was the hardest “uncomfortable” part you had to build to make this actually work?
This hits a real nerve. Most SEO tools stop at “what’s wrong” and never cross into “ship this now.”
Execution-first SEO definitely resonates more than another score or dashboard.
Curious though: how do you avoid users blindly shipping fixes without understanding why they matter?
It does what it is designed for. My question is : is SEO enough for website visibility as the LLM searches are increasing and search engine searches are decreasing? I think there should be a SEO tool for search engine of LLM.
It's a pretty good idea. Indeed, the SEO score alone doesn't help much unless you're an SEO expert yourself.
My only concern is timing. A couple of years ago this could have been dynamite from the start! 🧨
But now, as Google killed its search function with AI summaries and ads, the relevance of all SEO tools drop respectively. 💀
This is much closer to how SEO actually gets done in practice.
Audits don’t fail because they miss issues — they fail because they dump a backlog on you with no leverage. “Add FAQ schema” or “improve content depth” only helps if it turns into something that ships the same day.
That said, the risk with copy-paste fixes is context. SEO changes aren’t equal across sites, and blindly applying generated schema or content can create noise if prioritization isn’t solid. The value here depends heavily on how you decide which fixes deserve to exist at all.
The AI visibility angle is interesting, but I agree it’s heading toward commoditization fast. Monitoring mentions won’t matter unless the tool clearly translates “you’re missing” into “do this next, on this page, for this reason.”
If I could push one SEO button:
Surface one fix that’s both low effort and defensible, not just easy to ship.
Execution-first SEO works — but only when it’s opinionated about what not to do as well.
You nailed the core tension, copy-paste fixes are only valuable if the prioritization is right. Blindly generating schema for a page with bigger issues wont move it up in the rankings.
Right now Rankture prioritizes based on severity and impact (the usual) but your point about opinionated about what NOT to do; Rankture currently doesn't do this and I will definitely change this focus going forward.
What I'm trying to build toward is exactly what you described, 'your not mentioned [AI Tool Here] for this keyword(s)' we provide a template optimized for that query and actually generate it. Not completely there yet but that's the gap i see too.
Curious, when you say defensible are you thinking about fixes that won't get overwritten by devs or fixes that have lasting SEO value or both?
And thank you for your invaluable insight!
That clarification helps. By “defensible” I mostly mean fixes that survive real life — refactors, CMS changes, dev cleanups — and still matter even if rankings move around. Schema can help, but it’s fragile if it’s just layered on top instead of reinforcing the page’s intent. If Rankture can get opinionated about durability, not just severity, that feels like a real edge. Appreciate the thoughtful response — interesting direction.
I wish you goodluck with it, you seem to have something great going on here.
Thank you Angelcee, I appreciate the warm comment!
Love the "copy-paste fix" angle, Chris; hits home for non-SEOs like me bootstrapping BOS+HUB (dual ecosystem OS for ops/AI/community). I wasted hours on vague audits; your tool sounds like a time-saver.
What's one "what now?" fix you'd add next for brand mentions in LLMs?
Good luck with Rankture!
Thanks, I really appreciate that.
Great question on LLM Brand mentions. One 'what now" fix if you're not mentioned in a query you should own would be an LLM focused faq, built around the exact questions models ask, not just generic schema. Another (if that's already in place) would be an entity schema bundle; Organization, Product and Person, all with real data to help the models understand who/what and not just that you exist.
The pattern I keep seeing is people tracking AI mentions but having no playbook to improve them
Also curious about BOS+HUB, are you seeing AI tools mention anything in that space yet or is it still too niche for LLM awareness?
You nailed the core tension, copy-paste fixes are only valuable if the prioritization is right. Blindly generating schema for a page with bigger issues wont move it up in the rankings.
Right now Rankture prioritizes based on severity and impact (the usual) but your point about opinionated about what NOT to do; Rankture currently doesn't do this and I will definitely change this focus going forward.
What I'm trying to build toward is exactly what you described, 'your not mentioned [AI Tool Here] for this keyword(s)' we provide a template optimized for that query and actually generate it. Not completely there yet but that's the gap i see too.
Curious, when you say defensible are you thinking about fixes that won't get overwritten by devs or fixes that have lasting SEO value or both?
And thank you for your invaluable insight!
Link if you want to try it: rankture.com
Or drop your URL here and I'll tell you what it flags first — no pitch, just the top 3 issues.
You have to add login with Google (at a minimum if not Github also). I'm not going to enter my name, email, and password by hand for a site that has not bothered to allow modern login.