Hey IH — I'm the founder of VendBuddy, and I want to share the honest story of why I built this.
I work in the vending industry every day. And the single biggest thing that kills new operators isn't the machines, the products, or even the capital — it's finding locations.
Here's what the old process looked like:
You'd pay a "location service" $350–$500 upfront. They'd take 2–3 weeks. Then hand you a name and a phone number. No email. No title. No idea if the person actually makes placement decisions. You'd call, get a receptionist, leave a voicemail, and wait.
Rinse and repeat until you run out of money or patience.
I watched this happen to operator after operator. So I built VendBuddy to fix it.
What VendBuddy does:
Search any US ZIP code and get ranked prospects — warehouses, offices, gyms, medical buildings — with vending scores, foot traffic estimates, and the direct contact for the decision-maker (GM, facilities director, owner). Not a front desk number. The actual person who signs contracts.
From there you can run an ROI calc, build a product plan for the location, generate a placement contract, and track the deal in a pipeline — all without leaving the app.
The goal: find, pitch, and close a location in 24 hours.
Where we are:
50+ operators across 38 states using it in beta
- Operators landing $1,400–$4,200/month locations
- Pricing starts at $79/mo with a 7-day free trial
What I'm trying to figure out:
I'm an industry person who learned to build, not a developer who stumbled into vending. The product works. The challenge now is distribution — reaching the operators who need this before they waste $500 on a lead service that doesn't deliver.
If you're in the vending space, know someone who is, or have thoughts on B2B2C distribution for a niche tool like this, I'd genuinely love to hear from you.
Happy to answer any questions about the build, the niche, or the business.
— Founder, VendBuddy
vendbuddy.io
Interesting concept.
The thing I'd be careful with is that scoring systems often become the visible product, while the real reason people stay is something else entirely.
That sounds subtle, but getting that distinction wrong can affect everything from onboarding to conversion.
I wouldn't make that call casually in a thread.