1
1 Comment

I didn’t want to compete with Twilio. I just wanted to ship.

I didn’t wake up one day thinking, “Let me compete with Twilio.”

Zavu.dev exists because I got tired of paying a tax just to ship software.

For years, I built products that relied on messaging: WhatsApp, SMS, email.
Every time I launched something new, messaging was there, silently increasing costs, adding complexity, and shaping architectural decisions more than it should.

At some point, I realized something uncomfortable:

I wasn’t building products anymore.
I was building around my provider.

Every feature discussion included phrases like:

  • “That’s expensive at scale”
  • “We’ll optimize later”
  • “Let’s limit usage for now”
  • “We can’t expose this in the API”

That’s when the problem became clear.

The giants aren’t expensive because messaging is expensive.
They’re expensive because they optimized for enterprise procurement, not for builders.

So I started with a simple question:

What would a messaging platform look like if it were built only for developers who actually ship?

No sales calls.
No hidden pricing.
No forcing you into products you don’t need.
No punishing you for growth.

Just a clean API that does one job well:
let your software talk to humans, reliably and affordably.

Zavu.dev was not born as a “startup idea.”
It was born as internal infrastructure.
It already runs production traffic.

I was already shipping products.
I already felt the pain.
I already knew exactly what I would remove if I had the chance.

So I built the version I wished existed:

  • One API for WhatsApp, SMS, and email
  • Simple primitives instead of layered abstractions
  • Predictable pricing
  • Fast onboarding
  • Documentation written by someone who actually integrates APIs for a living
  • MCP Server for new AI agents

Competing with giants sounds bold from the outside.

From the inside, it felt inevitable.

Big platforms optimize for:

  • Sales teams
  • Contracts
  • Lock-in
  • Internal product silos

Small teams can optimize for:

  • Speed
  • Clarity
  • Developer empathy
  • Cost efficiency

I don’t believe most developers want more features.
They want fewer surprises.

Zavu.dev is intentionally boring infrastructure.
No hype. No buzzwords. No “AI-powered messaging revolution.”

Just something that works, scales, and doesn’t punish you when your product finally does well.

I’m sharing this here because Indie Hackers is one of the few places where people understand this motivation.

Not “I want to disrupt X.”
But “I couldn’t accept how broken this felt anymore.”

I’m not trying to replace giants overnight.

I’m building the alternative I wish I had when I was just trying to ship.

If you’ve ever felt your tools slowing you down instead of enabling you, you’ll get it.

posted to Icon for group Share Your Project
Share Your Project
on January 5, 2026
  1. 1

    This is a very real founder pain 🔥 “building around providers instead of building products” hits hard — infra choices quietly shaping product decisions is something every dev feels at scale.
    Also, for builders here — there’s a live idea comp where you can submit your idea for $19, winner gets a Tokyo trip. Just opened, so early stage = best chances.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I built an AI that turns an idea into a live business in under 10 minutes. Here’s what 1,000 launches taught me User Avatar 88 comments Building a startup costs $0. Your tooling budget costs $500K. Here's why. User Avatar 38 comments Building Noodle, a keyboard-first REST client for the terminal User Avatar 34 comments "Looks Good to Me" Is Quietly Killing Your Feedback Loop User Avatar 31 comments 787 tools for developers. 5 for nurses. Two weeks of tracking 14,000 indie launches. User Avatar 26 comments I didn't want to build another AI chatbot User Avatar 16 comments