I don’t want to build another AI scribe. I want to build an AI that challenges clinical reasoning.

I’m building AiDuxCare from a very personal place.
I’m a clinician (and very junior programmer), and after years of practice I keep coming back to the same concern:
Clinical work is not only about documenting what happened.
It is about making better decisions under uncertainty.
Most clinical AI tools today are trying to reduce friction — and that matters. Documentation is painful. Admin work is exhausting. Clinicians need tools that save time
But I don’t want to build just another AI scribe.
I’m exploring something different inside AiDuxCare.

We’re calling it Socrates.
The idea is simple: Socrates does not tell the clinician what to do.
It helps the clinician question the case better.
Not with generic advice.

With context.

This patient.
This clinician.
This clinical history.
This professional setting.
This moment of uncertainty.

Examples:

• “This concern has appeared in several encounters. Do you want to explore it before continuing?”
• “Symptoms seem to be improving, but function has not changed. Is the current plan still aligned with the patient’s goal?”
• “This hypothesis has been maintained for several visits. What evidence supports it, and what evidence challenges it?”
• “There is no recent objective reassessment documented. Is that intentional?”
• “This decision seems reasonable, but what alternative would you consider if the current approach fails?”

The goal is not autonomous clinical decision-making.
The goal is better clinical reasoning.

AI should not replace the clinician’s judgment.

But maybe it can help clinicians see more, question better, reduce blind spots, and support decisions with evidence that is relevant to that specific patient and that specific professional.

This is still early.

It is personal.

It may fail.

But I believe there is a real pain here: clinicians do not need more noise, more dashboards, or more unused features. They need tools that reduce cognitive load while protecting human judgment.

I’m looking for someone who would like to help build this with me.

Ideally someone interested in one or more of these areas:

• clinical AI
• healthcare UX
• reasoning systems
• TypeScript / React / Firebase
• AI safety and traceability
• clinical documentation workflows
• healthtech product strategy

I’m not looking to hand out cofounder equity casually.

But I am open to serious collaborators, contributors, advisors, or builders who understand that this is a long-term project with the potential to scale if we solve a real clinical pain.
If this resonates with you, I’d love to talk.