Hey IH, first post. I'm Smit, one of two founders behind linkutm. Wanted to introduce it founder-to-founder and get some holes poked in it.
The backstory is boring, and that's kind of the point. Every marketing team I worked with built UTMs by hand in a spreadsheet. One person types "facebook", another types "Facebook", a third writes "fb-ads". GA4 reads those as three sources, not one source with messy data. Three. The reports quietly lie, and nobody notices until a client asks why their Facebook numbers look off.
The usual stack made it worse. UTM building in a Google Sheet, shortening in Bitly (links that look like spam), QR codes in a fourth tool. Nothing talked to each other. Nothing was enforced.
So we built linkutm. A UTM builder that enforces naming rules automatically (lowercase, spaces to hyphens, required fields, blocked values), branded short links on your own domain, real-time click analytics, QR codes, and team workspaces. One place, clean data, no spreadsheet.
Honest stage check: we launched July 2025, small team of under 10 out of Surat, India. Free tier, paid starts at $9. No big logos to wave around yet.
What I'd genuinely want feedback on:
- Does "enforced naming conventions" land, or is that too niche a pain to lead with?
- Agency folks here: is workspace separation the hook, or is it branded domains?
- Anything in the positioning that reads generic? I keep fighting the urge to sound like every other SaaS.
Happy to answer anything about the build, the stack, or the go-to-market grind. linkutm.com if you want to tear the product apart.
nice you event put a free version of your tool for tracking urls.
What stood out is that you're not really selling UTM creation—you're selling decision quality.
Most teams don't notice inconsistent naming until they're making decisions from fragmented data. Preventing bad data from existing is a much stronger value proposition than making UTMs a little faster to create.