I kept forgetting important stuff in my daily life, so I built an AI second brain called AMP to fix it

The retrieval through natural questions angle is the right thing to lead with, that is what makes it feel different from notes and reminders. One thing stood out the moment I hit the login screen though.
The product holds the most sensitive things a person has, where the passport is, who owes money, the daily schedule, and the one word promise on the page is secure.
But there is no privacy policy, no terms, and nothing that says what secure actually means.
Is it encrypted at rest, who on your side can read it, does the text get sent to an LLM and if so which one and is it retained.
Two reasons to fix this early. First, for this category that disclosure is not legal boilerplate, it is the product, because trust is the entire reason someone would put their passport location into an app.
Second, calling something secure without backing it is exactly the kind of unsubstantiated claim that regulators treat as deceptive, so the safe move is to either describe the concrete security or soften the word until it is true. A short privacy page and one honest paragraph on data handling would do more for conversion here than another feature.

This makes sense immediately — the core idea is basically “structured memory you can query later,” which is a real pain point.

What stands out is that the value isn’t in storing notes, but in retrieval through natural questions. That’s the part that actually feels different from normal note apps or reminders.

The biggest risk I see is trust + correctness. For something like “where is my passport” or “who owes me money,” users will only adopt it if they’re fully confident nothing gets lost or misremembered. Memory systems have zero tolerance for ambiguity.

Also, it may help to be very clear about boundaries — is it just a personal memory layer, or does it also act like a task/reminder system? Those tend to blur, and that’s where users get confused.

But conceptually, the direction is strong: turning scattered notes into a queryable personal context layer is something a lot of people already try to hack together manually.

The core use case is immediately clear and that's a real advantage — most people have had that exact moment of 'wait, where did I put my passport?' Your examples make the value obvious without needing to explain anything.

The question I'd have from a user perspective: what does the capture flow look like? The hardest part of personal memory tools is getting people to actually log things in the moment they happen. A home screen widget or voice shortcut that makes adding a fact feel like near-zero friction could be the difference between daily use and 'I'll add stuff later' (which tends to become never).

Would be curious to hear how your early testers are using the capture side — that's usually where the real behavior patterns show up.

One thing I'd be careful with:

The interesting question may not be whether AMP remembers things accurately.

It may be what users are actually trusting it to remember on their behalf.

That sounds subtle, but it can quietly shape what gets stored, what feels valuable, and what makes someone keep using it over time.

I wouldn't make that call casually this early.