I have an idea for a simple directory/community-style application in a specific niche that I can code, but I am slightly caught up in my work and another side project. At the same time, I know that it can be done in a no-code tool like Bubble or Softr (there are maker pad tutorials that cover my use case).
I believe that if I go for the no-code MVP route, I will eventually end up rebuilding the application from scratch, mostly because I prefer to operate an application where I have full control and understanding, as well as to ensure that I can quickly iterate on new features.
At the same time, building an MVP without code can be appealing so that you can quickly validate your idea. If you were in my place, what would you prefer to do? Do you have any experience in moving from a no-code platform to a custom code application?
Your suggestions would be greatly appreciated :)
Go with what you know! It will improve your skill as a developer, you can reference the project in any future interviews (if you stay in full-time development), and while it's possible that it would be quicker to learn Bubble and use that, it isn't guaranteed!
Use your skills to your advantage. If it's faster for you coding, then do it. It'll benefit in the long term too.
The fastest way is the way you know.
If there is a Makerpad tutorial that pretty much covers what you want, I would say build your MVP using a no-code tool.
It depends on how fast/cheap you can build your MVP at this stage. If the idea is validated, you can always build it with code on the side while the no-code application is still running.
I'd say go for no-code. My co-founder and I can both code but went with bubble instead.
Yes it does take time for you to learn it, but you can use it over and over again for your next projects!
Plus you don't have to go through the cycle of writing code, learning from feedback, deleting code and rewriting code
None of both options. Validate your idea without building anything, by sharing it :)