Six months ago I kept running into the same problem. I'd want to build something but had no idea what people actually needed. I'd skim Reddit, check HN, glance at Product Hunt — and get overwhelmed. Signal in there, buried in noise.
So I automated the boring part.
Signal Scanner scrapes Reddit, Hacker News, X, and Product Hunt daily, then scores every problem it finds across three dimensions:
The goal was simple: give myself a ranked list of things worth building, backed by real signal rather than vibes.
It now has 558 problems scored, updated daily. No signup required to browse.
A couple from this week that caught my eye:
"Serverless Usage Circuit Breaker" (Demand: 5/5, Gap: 5/5, Effort: 1/5) — Runaway Cloudflare Workers from AI agents are causing surprise $1K+ bills. No native circuit breaker exists. Source: HN thread with 200+ upvotes.
"Security Auditor for AI-Generated Codebases" (Demand: 5/5, Gap: 5/5, Effort: 1/5) — Vibe coders are shipping apps with no RLS, exposed DBs, hardcoded secrets. Zero visibility into what Claude actually built.
Both weekend-project-sized gaps with real demand.
signals.microbuilder.co — free, no account needed.
Curious: do you use tools like this for ideation, or do you trust your own problem sense more? I've found it more useful for gut-checking ideas I already have than for pure inspiration — but wondering if others use it differently.