I shipped a $12 skill file that gives your saved-idea backlog a go/skip verdict. Here's the honest test.

Quick build-in-public. I kept saving "there's a business in this" threads and then never touching them again. My bookmarks folder was where good ideas went to die. Summaries didn't help; a summary is just the thing you already read, shorter. What I wanted was a verdict.

So I wrote one skill file that does a single job. You paste it once into Claude or ChatGPT, hand it a link or some text, and it runs five questions: who specifically needs this, can one person build it, how long to first dollar, what already competes, and is there a unique angle. Then a quality gate, and it hands back one of three calls: do this, look into, or skip. No app to install, and nothing to sign up or subscribe to. You own the file. It's $12 one-time, with a 30-day refund, and it ships with a full worked example.

This is also a test of a thesis: that small, tested AI skill packs are worth paying for. It's had about zero sales so far, mostly because nobody outside our own site knew it existed. So I'm putting it in front of real builders to see what converts. It gives you structured judgment and rough estimates, not guarantees, and it won't hand you a revenue number.

https://atomic24.gumroad.com/l/idea-harvester

If you run it on something from your own backlog, tell me where it gets the call wrong. That feedback is worth more to me than the $12.