2
1 Comment

I spent 2 months writing blog posts that got 12 total visits. Building in public on Twitter changed everything.

Here's the reality nobody tells you about building in public: the content itself is rarely the problem. It's the distribution channel.

I spent 8 weeks writing what I thought were genuinely useful blog posts. In-depth guides, case studies, honest breakdowns of what was working and what wasn't. I put real thought into every word.

The result: 12 visits across 2 months. Not 12 visitors a day. 12 total.

That number broke something in me.

I couldn't understand it. The posts were good. They were genuinely useful. But there was nobody reading them.

The hard truth: a blog with zero reach is just a private document that you're embarrassed to share because nobody's validating it anyway.

So I pivoted. Hard.

I started building in public on Twitter instead. Sharing the same insights, the same journey, the same honest breakdowns. But this time, there was an audience already there.

Here's what happened in week one on Twitter:

  • 23 genuine conversations in my DMs
  • 3 people telling me "I've been trying to solve this exact problem"
  • 2 potential users who converted to a waitlist
  • More real feedback in 7 days than I got in 8 weeks of blogging

The content was identical. The platform was different. The outcome was completely different.

The lesson that cost me 2 months to learn:

Distribution is not an afterthought. It's the product.

If nobody sees what you build, it doesn't exist. Building in public on social platforms solves both problems at once: you get the content AND the audience simultaneously.

It also gives you something a blog can't: real-time feedback from real humans while you're still figuring things out.

I used to think "I'll build it first, then market it." Turns out, the marketing process IS the product discovery process.

Now, the question becomes: how do you maintain the consistency required for building in public without burning out on content creation?

I've started using xbeast.io — an AI X/Twitter automation tool that handles the consistent posting so I can focus on the actual building. The goal isn't to sound like a content machine. It's to stay visible while you figure things out.

The best thing about building in public? You find out fast whether anyone actually cares about the problem you're trying to solve.

What's your experience been with distribution vs. content quality? I'd love to hear how others have cracked this nut.

posted to Icon for group Building in Public
Building in Public
on May 17, 2026
  1. 1

    Agree the blog failed. Disagree with the lesson.

    Your own data contradicts "distribution beats content quality." Content was identical — and it generated 23 DM conversations on Twitter vs 12 blog visits. If quality didn't matter, identical content wouldn't have converted once seen. What the data actually shows is narrower: a blog with zero audience is zero distribution surface. Quality still mattered — that's why the same content worked once it had somewhere to land.

    The xbeast pivot is worth questioning for the same reason. What worked was 23 genuine human conversations and real-time feedback. AI posting automation generates volume, not conversations. You're attributing the win to authentic engagement, then recommending the tool that automates the authentic part away.

Trending on Indie Hackers
30 days ago I posted here with $0 revenue. Here's what actually happened next. User Avatar 148 comments I used $30,983 of AI tokens last month in Claude code on $200/mo plan User Avatar 90 comments my reddit post got 600K+ views. here's exactly what i did User Avatar 58 comments How to spot high-intent customers in 5 minutes, for free. User Avatar 44 comments Fixing broken scrapers instead of working on my actual product. So I made it my problem. User Avatar 38 comments I Built a Habit Tracker SaaS Alone in 6 Weeks (No CS Degree, No Team). Here's Exactly How User Avatar 37 comments