3
3 Comments

I spent 3 months building a website audit engine that outputs AI-ready fix prompts — here's what the market data actually says

I kept seeing the same pattern in the "AI for SEO" space: founders building lightweight Lighthouse wrappers and selling them as "AI audits." A 5-minute scan that tells you your TTFB is slow. Helpful, sure. But not something you'd pay $50+/mo for.

So I went looking for the actual market gap.

I scraped Fiverr SEO audit gigs (3,400+ listings). The price spread runs from $30 for a basic checklist to $5,000+ for an agency report with competitor analysis. The middle is dead: nobody sells a $49 automated tool that outputs competitor-ready reports.

That dollar gap told me something: existing tools dump PDFs. Agencies sell reports. Nobody bridges the two.

Instead of building another SEO tool, I built an audit engine that outputs AI-ready fix prompts you can paste into Cursor, Claude, or Bolt. Every issue includes: estimated revenue impact, framework-aware fix steps (Next.js vs Astro vs HTML), acceptance criteria, and file paths.

We also run competitor discovery — the engine names 3-5 real competitors and scores them on the same dimensions. No "Competitor A/B/C."

I just ran it on stripe.com. The result: 57/100 (Grade F), 3 named competitors (Tax Pros, Best Tax, Tax Services), $3,300/mo in fixable revenue leakage, and a pasteable fix prompt for their missing lead capture form.

The part I'm most nervous about sharing: this is our third build pass after two scrapped prototypes. The first was a Chrome extension nobody installed. The second was a WordPress plugin that was too generic. The third version — the one that works — starts with a real crawl, runs 18 dimensions of analysis, and delegates the fix writing to an LLM with the crawl data as context.

The product is outboundautonomy.com — you can paste any URL and get scored in 90 seconds for free.

I'm still figuring out distribution. Day 48, $0 in revenue. But the engine works, the trial is live (3 days free, card required, $0 today), and I have a real call with an agency partner on Thursday.

Happy to answer questions about the build, the market data, or the competitor discovery approach.

posted to Icon for group SAAS
SAAS
on June 3, 2026
  1. 1

    Wow I'm glad I'm here. I feel exactly how you feel . I'm working on an app that has 0 revenue but I'm learning . Hopefully I'll get the gist of it .

  2. 1

    This is a much sharper product than a normal SEO audit wrapper because you are not selling “find issues.” You are selling the bridge between audit and implementation.

    The part I’d be careful with is who the first buyer is.

    If you sell this to founders directly, the AI-ready fix prompts are the main value. But if you sell to agencies, the bigger value is probably client-ready diagnosis plus implementation scope. Agencies do not just need prompts. They need something they can use to sell, justify, or hand off work.

    So I would pressure-test the agency path very directly:

    Can an agency run this on a prospect’s site and use the output to start a paid website improvement conversation?

    That is a cleaner wedge than “automated website audit.”

    For your Thursday agency call, I’d focus less on explaining the engine and more on whether they would use the report in three places: prospecting, client reporting, or implementation handoff.

    Happy to put a tighter version in writing if useful. I’d map the agency distribution angle, trial friction, positioning, and how I’d structure that first agency call so it can turn into a paid pilot.

  3. 1

    Appreciate the engagement on this — seems like the Fiverr data angle is striking a nerve. For anyone digging into their own crawl issues, I published a crawl budget audit checklist this morning with the 10 data points every SEO audit needs:

    https://medium.com/@outboundautonomy/the-agency-owners-crawl-budget-audit-checklist-10-data-points-every-seo-audit-needs-88445ae350ab

    It's the framework I use before running the engine — crawl topology issues (orphan pages, duplicate canonicals, soft 404 cascades) are usually the bottleneck before any content optimization matters. Happy to walk through anyone's specific audit questions.

Trending on Indie Hackers
Priorities for launching a SaaS solo, with no budget User Avatar 173 comments I Rejected a $15K Acquisition Offer for My Multi-Agent IDE — Here's the Full Breakdown User Avatar 29 comments I built a tool directory that doesn't pretend every founder has the same needs User Avatar 22 comments 5 Books, Make Smarter User Avatar 10 comments Why founder-led outbound breaks the moment you try to delegate it User Avatar 7 comments I built a browser-based photo geotagging tool. What should I lead with? User Avatar 6 comments