3
7 Comments

I stopped hunting for beta testers. Directory submissions find them now.

Every time I started something new, the same dead week showed up. The product was half built and I was in Reddit threads and Discord servers asking people to please take a look. It is a bad trade. You burn the hours you should be building on persuading strangers to care, and most of what comes back is politeness.

So I changed the order. Now I list the product while I am still building it, and let the directories bring me the first users.

The loop is boring, which is the point. I point my agent at SubmitMap over MCP and go back to work. It reads the product, works out which directories will actually accept it, and fills the forms in my browser. I do not watch. A week or two later listings start going live and people show up who were already looking for something like this. Some of them poke at it and tell me what is broken. A few pay.

The part I did not expect is that they are better testers than anyone I ever recruited. They came looking for the thing. They have the problem. When one of them says a page is confusing, they are not doing me a favour, they are telling me why they were about to leave.

The numbers, because the claim is worthless without them

I have been running this on SubmitMap itself, which is a directory of launch platforms, so yes, the recursion is a little silly.

Twenty one days. 261 of the 594 platforms in the directory, 270 submissions in total.

  • 57 listings are live

  • 48 have a launch date booked

  • 153 are sitting in a queue

  • 3 came back rejected

Of the 57 live listings, 35 carry a followed link and 20 do not.

That last number is the one nobody puts in the guide. More than a third of the listings you win are nofollow, and a good share of the directories advertising a followed link only hand it over if you finish top three on your launch day, or keep their badge in your footer forever and let them re-crawl for it.

The prices, since none of them are money:

  • 129 of the 270 wanted a badge on my site

  • 14 made me upvote and comment on other people's products first

What this is not

It is not free traffic. Most directories send almost nobody. The ones worth having send a trickle of people who are already shopping, which is a different thing and a better one.

It is not a blast either. I submitted to 261 platforms out of 594 because I only submitted where the product actually qualified. A submission you were never eligible for is just a rejection you wait a month for. That is why the qualifying step exists instead of a button that says submit to 100 directories.

And it is slow. 153 of those submissions are still in a queue. Two of the directories I walked this month quietly closed their free lane between me writing the entry and me trying to use it.

Try the order

Build. List while you build. Let the first users find you.

Then stop asking your friends whether the idea is good. They are going to say yes.

posted toAvatar for product SubmitMap
SubmitMap
  1. 1
    Really interesting point about directory users being better testers because they were already looking for the solution. I’m currently trying to get the first 3–5 testers for Zaivy, an early product for people trying to start and build a side hustle. If you were starting with a small beta like that, would you still use directories this early, or wait until the product was publicly launched?
    1. 1

      There are launch platforms/directories that are built specifically for this use case; they even accept waitlists. I mean, for me this process became the best way to validate my idea; you build an MVP and launch it on 100+ platforms, and in 100+ days, you instantly publish your product, and you get first feedback and potential customers almost for free without getting distracted from the development process.

  2. 1
    The “better testers because they came looking for it” signal is more interesting than the 270 submissions. Curious whether those directory-sourced users are also converting better than users you recruited manually, or if the quality advantage is showing up mainly in feedback so far.
    1. 1
      Feedback, mostly. But I went and pulled the numbers before answering and one of them surprised me. In the last 7 days, directory listings sent 219 people and 22 of them made an account. X and Reddit sent 210 people and 7 made an account. That's the closest comparison I have to your "recruited manually", since posting by hand is what I was doing there. Same size audience, three times the signups.
      1. 1
        That’s a meaningful difference. I’d be interested in digging a bit deeper into what’s driving the quality gap — happy to continue the conversation privately. What’s the best email to reach you on?
        1. 1
          I wouldn't want to publish any of my email addresses here, if you want you can DM me on X - @5thwye_
          1. 1
            Fair enough. I don’t use X, so I’ll leave it here for now. The directory-vs-manual acquisition difference is still an interesting signal.