35
25 Comments

I thought SEO for SaaS was “just publish a blog.” Then I looked at the index and felt embarrassed.

I’m Serghey. I help SaaS projects with SEO through dricomm.com, and I’m also building checkanalytic.com — privacy-friendly analytics I created for myself because I got tired of running growth on gut feelings.

This isn’t a story about “secret tactics” or “10x in 14 days.” It’s about how I stepped on the same rakes more than once — and why today I start SEO not with articles, but with the foundation: indexing, structure, canonicals, robots, and measurement. Yes, it’s not the most exciting part. It’s also the part that actually makes revenue possible.

Failure #1: “Let’s just do content”

The first SaaS teams I worked with looked very similar:

• the product exists (maybe a bit rough),

• the landing page is decent,

• payments are connected,

• “now we need SEO traffic.”

At that moment someone usually says:

“We need a blog. The more articles, the more traffic.”

I agreed. We wrote. We published. We made a “content plan.” In Notion it looked like a growth machine.

Then I opened Search Console / the index — and it felt like Google was politely pretending we didn’t exist.

That was the uncomfortable lesson:

content doesn’t work if your site isn’t technically and structurally ready to rank.

It’s like trying to accelerate a car with the handbrake on. The engine screams, you press harder, and nothing moves — and you can even convince yourself you just need “more effort.”

Failure #2: “Everything’s fine, Google is just slow”

This is the favorite startup excuse. It was mine too.

Until I started checking what was actually being indexed. And what I saw was everything except what should bring leads:

• parameter pages,

• duplicates,

• URL variants with and without trailing slashes,

• weird “service” pages,

• and the best part — canonicals set like they were added “just because.”

In some projects, the canonical tag looked like someone added it without realizing it’s basically an instruction to the search engine:

“this is the main version of the page.”

If you get that wrong, you don’t slow growth — you disable it. Not Google. You.

After a couple of those audits, I adopted one rule:

before content — cleanup.

The real SEO problems early-stage SaaS have (as they show up in real life)

1) “We built the product — the market will figure it out”

Most SaaS sites have the “checkbox” pages:

• Features

• Pricing

• About

And almost none of the pages that match actual demand:

• “for whom” (industries / roles)

• “what problem we solve” (use cases)

• integrations

• alternatives

• comparisons

• “how to fix pain X”

So Google doesn’t understand which queries you should show up for. And you can’t understand where the money in organic should come from — because you haven’t created the right entry points.

2) Title/Description/H1 feels “minor” until it gets expensive

Early-stage sites often have:

• the same title on half the pages,

• missing or template meta description,

• two h1s (or none),

• h2s that live their own life.

It seems like cosmetics. In reality it sends a weak signal to search: “we don’t even know what matters here.”

3) Robots + indexing: “We accidentally cut off our oxygen”

This happens more often than people want to admit:

• noindex on important pages,

• robots.txt blocking key sections,

• sitemap missing or broken.

And a team “does SEO” for a month while growth doesn’t start because of something that takes 15 minutes to fix — if anyone checks it.

4) Canonicalization error is a quiet growth killer

In short: you can build the right pages, but the search engine treats a different version as the main one (or treats none as main).

In reality it looks like:

• you publish,

• pages exist,

• rankings don’t start or they behave randomly.

Until canonicals and duplicates are fixed, it’s like building floors on a house without a foundation.

5) The most painful one: “We do SEO, but nobody measures money”

I’ve seen teams where SEO discussions looked like:

• “traffic is up”

• “and sign-ups?”

• “not sure”

• “but traffic is up!”

That’s exactly why I built checkanalytic.com. I wanted a simple answer to a simple question:

which pages drive sign-ups/payments, and which pages just generate noise.

If you don’t connect SEO to conversion, you’re not managing a channel — you’re managing activity.

Why I include a security check (and why it’s not “paranoia”)

Early SaaS lives in “ship faster” mode. That’s normal. But there’s a zone where “later” becomes expensive:

• suspicious redirects,

• injected scripts,

• risky configurations,

• broken security headers,

• issues that hit trust and conversion.

I’m not claiming every startup gets attacked tomorrow. I’ve just seen enough to know:

security is part of marketing — because trust is conversion.

How I build SEO for SaaS now (short, operational)

Today my approach is a series of fast sprints. Less romance, more predictability.

Sprint 1: remove growth blockers

This is what people usually pay for first because it moves fastest:

• title, meta description, proper h1/h2 structure

• robots optimization and indexing control

• duplicate fixes and redirects

• Fix Canonicalization error

• removing index junk

• baseline security check

Goal: stop the site from sabotaging itself.

Sprint 2: landing pages for real demand

Then we build pages that can actually rank and convert:

• use-case pages

• industries

• integrations

• comparisons/alternatives (without being toxic)

• pages for pains people actually type into Google

Not “we’re innovative.” More like “we solve this exact problem.”

Sprint 3: analytics as a control loop

This is where I bring everything back to measurable outcomes:

• which pages drive sign-ups

• where the funnel leaks

• what changed → what happened

This is also where checkanalytic.com fits in:

The privacy-friendly lightweight analytics. See your first traffic data in under 2 minutes. No cookies. Safe script.

And we track which page drives sign-ups if you install the Event code. Then you can see where people drop off — and which SEO changes move real KPIs versus which ones only look good on a checklist.

Why I do a free quick SEO Report / Audit + security check

Because founders don’t need “another call just to talk.” They need clarity:

• what the biggest bottleneck is right now,

• what to fix first,

• which 3–5 changes will deliver the highest impact.

That’s why I have a free entry point: dricomm.com/free-audit/ (no “miracles by tomorrow,” just a real breakdown).

If you’re building a SaaS and SEO isn’t growing — here’s a fast test

Answer honestly:

1. Do you have pages that match real demand, or only “Features/Pricing”?

2. Are you sure the right pages are indexed and not killed by canonicals/robots?

3. Can you name 3 pages that drive sign-ups without guessing?

If any answer is “I’m not sure” — it’s not a disaster. It just means SEO isn’t a system yet; it’s a set of actions.

posted toAvatar for product DRICOMM LTD
DRICOMM LTD
  1. 4

    What’s your situation?

    • no traffic at all

    • traffic exists but sign-ups are weak

    • indexing is weird / growth doesn’t start

    • it’s mostly technical (robots/canonicals/duplicates)

    1. 2

      Can you check my website?

      AND I need your accurate statistics!

      1. 1

        Of course! Write to me on the website dricomm.com or on X @dricomm_com

    2. 2

      Google keeps giving me errors about duplicates and canonical links. I'm fed up! I'll get in touch!

      1. 1

        Okay! I'll respond anytime!

  2. 2

    100% agree with a lot of this - especially the “car with the handbrake on” analogy.

    I’m running a semi-programmatic SEO experiment for a UK consumer fintech (automated mobile/broadband/energy switching), and what surprised me most wasn’t content velocity, it was indexing behaviour.

    After ~12 days, based on last ~48h Search Console data, we’re running at almost ~50k impressions/month run rate. Rankings are volatile, clicks still modest - but indexing velocity has been much faster than I expected.

    What made the difference for us wasn’t just publishing volume. It was:

    • strict canonical + metadata validation before publish
    • dedupe checks in the pipeline
    • controlled internal linking between related articles
    • staggered publishing dates
    • JSON → compiled HTML workflow with quality checks before going live

    Fully agree that without structure + measurement, “more content” just amplifies chaos.

    Curious, when you fix canonical/indexing issues on early SaaS sites, how long do you typically see before impressions stabilise?

    1. 1

      Rough rule of thumb for early SaaS:

      • 3–7 days: key pages get re-crawled (if sitemap/internal links are clean)

      • 1–3 weeks: index coverage + impressions start trending in the right direction

      • 4–8 weeks: volatility reduces and you get a clearer baseline

      Biggest accelerators: clean sitemap, strong internal linking, removing duplicates/params, and validating canonicals at build-time (like you described). Stabilisation usually takes a few crawl cycles, not days.

  3. 2

    100% agree — content is gasoline, but technical SEO is the engine. Without clean indexing + structure you’re basically publishing into a void.

  4. 2

    This resonates a lot. The “content with the handbrake on” analogy perfectly describes what happens when indexing and canonicals are ignored. I’ve seen teams push blog output for months without realizing Google was never given a clear signal in the first place.

  5. 2

    This resonates a lot.

    I’ve seen something similar but from the product side: founders jump to “more features” the same way they jump to “more content” in SEO.

    It feels productive. It looks productive. But the foundation is often leaking.

    I’m building a SaaS as well, and the biggest shift for me was exactly what you said: connecting activity to revenue.

    Traffic without conversion insight is just ego.

    Curious — when you run your audits, what’s the most common “silent killer” you see in early SaaS?

    1. 1

      You can't imagine, but even the most typical mistakes (without delving into the problem):

      1) H1, H2, H3 - no specific keywords

      2) robots.txt

      3) Error in HTTPS encryption

      4) No canonical tags

      5) Alt tags for images

      6) Duplicate content

      1. 2

        Totally agree.

        What surprises me most is how often the issues aren’t “advanced SEO problems” — they’re basic structural mistakes.

        Things like missing keyword intent in headers, weak internal linking, or pages that search engines technically can’t index properly.

        Founders jump to “more content” when the real problem is that the existing pages aren’t structurally readable by search engines.

  6. 2

    SEO is not just writing blogs. First fix the technical base (indexing, structure, canonicals, tracking), then create pages for real demand, and always measure sign-ups — not just traffic. That’s how SEO brings real revenue.

  7. 2

    This hits hard. We ran into the exact same problem on our ecommerce site. Had a WordPress setup with 200+ indexed pages but half of them were garbage. Plugin generated URLs, duplicate pages, parameter variations. Google was indexing everything except the pages that actually mattered.

    When we rebuilt on Next.js, the biggest SEO win wasn't the content. It was the cleanup. Proper canonical tags, clean URL structure, no plugin junk cluttering the index. Went from a mess of random indexed pages to a tight sitemap where every page has a purpose.

    Your Sprint 1 approach is spot on. Most people jump straight to content and wonder why nothing ranks. The foundation work isn't exciting but it's the reason everything else works.

    One thing I'd add: image optimization is a silent killer. Our WordPress site was serving full-size images on every page. Switching to Next.js Image component with automatic WebP conversion and lazy loading cut our page weight by 80%. Google noticed immediately.

    1. 1

      I completely agree with you! But even WordPress has huge advantages—it's easy to install! More problems arise if our SEO clients want to install our Check Analytic, there are confidentiality issues, and we have to forcefully disable various WordPress features! But even then, you can opt out of everything and work without any problems!

      1. 2

        Yeah WordPress itself isn't the problem. It's what people pile on top of it. A clean WordPress install with minimal plugins can actually perform well. The issue is most businesses end up with 20+ plugins and a page builder before they realize the performance cost. By then it's cheaper to rebuild than to untangle.

  8. 2

    Really resonated with this. Content feels productive but without the right foundation it's basically invisible, I learned that the hard way too with Sorti. The point about indexing and structure is something I think most early founders (myself included) skip because it doesn't feel exciting. Thanks for the honest breakdown.

    1. 1

      If you have any questions, please contact us!

  9. 2

    This is such a common realization. Content feels productive, but without proper indexing and structure it’s basically invisible work. Foundations rarely feel exciting, yet they’re what actually move growth.

    1. 1

      You are 100% right.

  10. 2

    With ~18 years in corporate marketing & now working on my own products, I am very comfortable with marketing strategy but rely on AI for all SEO guidance - clear that seo is a hot topic (somewhat surprising to me tbh) and plenty of people can now build but traffic remains an unsolved area

  11. 2

    I made the exact same mistake when I started — I kept publishing pages and tools, but later realized many weren’t even indexed properly.

    Fixing structure, titles, and indexing brought more real users than adding new content.

    One thing I’d add for founders: before writing more, search your own site on Google and see what actually appears. That alone reveals a lot of hidden problems.

    Most growth issues are foundation issues, not content issues.

  12. 2

    You've written about real problems that I think everyone has experienced, and your solution seems solid. I can't make any sales because of SEO issues. I think I'll need your help.