1
3 Comments

I want to help your developers get more done. What do you think?

Hey all,

I've been focusing on a pain point that I've noticed at my day job, and I think a lot of other people have similar experiences. We're a fast-paced startup and we have great unit tests, but virtually no end-to-end tests. It's also expensive to task developers with writing tests instead of new features. Also, a perfect test suite won't do us any good if we aren't around next year!

But testing is really important for your product, and it can be hard to balance the time you spend making sure you have quality tests and are able to keep pushing out new features.

I'm solving this problem by building a tool that lets you create integration tests and end-to-end tests through a simple UI, no coding required.

Ultimately, the devs can keep building features to grow the business, and replace the old-school approach of hand-written end-to-end and integration tests with an interface anyone can easily use.

What do you think? https://testsuite.io

on January 20, 2020
  1. 2

    In our QA team at work, we recently did some research and there are LOTS of products like this out there. Which problems are you solving that other products like TestSigma, Crossbrowsertesting, TestComplete, Ranorex, Test Cafe Studio etc. are not?

  2. 2

    In place of schedule and stuff should sell on integrating into the development process, CI systems / github...

    The blue sentences look like link while they are not.

    I don't personally get people who make unit tests over 2e2 tests, I'd go the other way.

    There are a few tools on the market, most are expensive, not that good IMHO, and everything still needs developers or at best one level before..

  3. 2

    I would use and pay for this. I'm a solo dev building out our entire stack and although unit and e2e tests are a high priority for me, sadly they're not at the top of the sprint list due to time constraints. I have a non-dev partner who QA's everything we do before release, but that can definitely fail to reveal issues. I was actually thinking of something very similar to this in my head the other day. Glad you're taking it on. The create tests without code feature would be a game changer for us since my non-dev partner would be able to create the tests while I'm building out the next features.

    One thing I'm been wanting to see and I feel this could potentially take it on would be user simulation. Would love to be able to simulate "real" load for my app. Something like 100 users for X amount of minutes running our user flows would be nice so we could try to test load in a way that's different than blasting our API with cURL requests.