I was tired of No Fixes for my SEO needs
As a solo founder I imagine many of you had to learn new skills, at times being extremely frustated, and have felt the ecstatic happiness when things click.
The parts that I remember the most are the frustations and the aha moments.
For one of those frustrations I created KinetixSEO.com. A tool first used by myself but now mature enough to share with the world. It is built on what I need and most likely a lot of what you need.
Hiring someone for SEO cost me hundreds per landingpage and hundreds more per page and still did not know wether is worked.
So I build a page scan that check over 150 metrics and if possible gives you the right fix you can just copy paste.
There is ofcourse much more but the core is a page scan and fixes. No need for guessing, no need to read up on things you dont have time for.
I would love to hear your thoughts, experiences, and if you want to take this tools for a spin, dm me for a coupon for free scans. All I ask in return is for you to tell me what you like, dislike and what to improve upon.
My product page also has a coupon for free scans. Let me know what you think!
The “fixes instead of just reporting problems” angle is interesting, especially when SEO tools can leave founders with a long list of issues but little clarity on what actually matters.
I’m curious what you’ve found is hardest to determine once a founder has implemented the recommended fixes.
That is a very good question, what I build is a button 'Check Fixes'. So after a scan you can implement recommended fixes and have that checked again. It gives you a way of a double check.
As for how it works, why not try it for free yourself: KBG6-C297. Use that coupon to scan 2 pages for free with all the bells and whistles. I would love to hear what you think.
That makes sense. The re-check loop is useful because it closes the gap between recommending a fix and actually verifying that it worked.
I’ll keep an eye on how KBG develops.
“No fixes” is the frustrating part of SEO tools—lots of data, but not enough direction. SERPSpur focuses on actionable SEO analysis, from technical audits and backlinks to SERP and local SEO checks. The goal is simple: find the problem and know what to work on next.
https://serpspur.com
Interesting approach. One thing I’d find especially valuable is separating “issues detected” from “changes likely to make a measurable difference.”
A scan with 150 checks can become overwhelming, so I’d consider ranking fixes by:
It would also be useful to show a simple before-and-after view: what changed, when it changed, and whether impressions, rankings or conversions improved afterward. That feedback loop could make the product more useful than a traditional SEO checklist.
How are you currently prioritizing the recommended fixes?
I agree, it took a while to get a format that was not instantly overwhelming. When you scan a page and ai did it work, you get 4 tabs: Summary, issues, measurements and advanced. Each has its own purpose. The measurements page is the biggest. It has 16 tabs with loads of information ranging from technical SEO to structural readability.
As for the before and after view, yes, that is possible. you can compare 2 scans but you can also verify your fixes. Apply fixes and from within the scan verify them.
Why dont you give it a whirl, use KBG6-C297 and get 2 free page scans with no obligation at all. I would love to hear what you think, what you like, dislike and what you are missing.