6
14 Comments

IH needs a pro-code group and here's why

I see IH has a very large group for no-code-based tech and a somewhat smaller one for low-code. I'm excited for this emerging concept and kinda freaked out about how powerful it could be, especially when combined with WASM/WebAssembly edge/near-edge containers & datastores.

What IH group is serving pro-code's userbase?

Or, is the concept so new it simply doesn't exist yet?

*edits to title: I suck at copy.

on July 23, 2022
  1. 6

    Anyone experienced will know why no-code/low code won't work in the longer term. It works really well as a rapid application development (RAD). It doesn't work as it's hard to scale and low barrier-to-entry, etc. It's more of a product/service to enable niche application and not a platform.

    I think as a small IH, a lot of IH here are just using existing technology to build a product-fit for a niche market. Which is a good use case for no/low code. But again, as the business scales, moving away is such an easy migration (since everything is quite well understood/defined), that I think no/low code platform will always hit a wall regards to growth.

    1. -2

      This comment has been voted down. Click to show.

      1. 1

        You are right. Internal tools typically have different requirements though. One can also use any of the traditional RAD tools.

  2. 1

    "Here's why"

    Literally says nothing about why...

    1. 1

      because the concept of JavaScript/WASM containers making up a pro-code pluggable system is fascinating. Sorry I didn’t make it more clear.

  3. 1

    The definitions of no-code, low-code, and pro-code I’m basing my understanding on are spelled out in detail here: https://towardsdatascience.com/no-code-low-code-and-pro-code-a71b25935d2b

  4. 1

    What does pro-code mean?

    1. 1

      I understood it to mean a professional dev writes custom code for just the important bits that are plugged into a larger system.

      1. 0

        That is low-code if you mean plugged into no-code tools.

        1. 1

          Not according to this: https://towardsdatascience.com/no-code-low-code-and-pro-code-a71b25935d2b
          I think according to this definition, the original Windows Control Panel’s .cpl applet system is an example of pro-code.

          1. 1

            Interesting never heard the term "pro-code" in the no-code space after building a tool for it for 5+ years.

    2. 1

      anti-no/low code I guess?

      1. 1

        I think it would mean more defaulting to code whereas no-code defaults to no-code tools.

  5. 0

    Most of the indie hackers on the wbe space are "pro-coders" in case you want to meet more indie devs ;)