I'll turn your recording into a week of posts, in your voice. Free, first 5 founders.
I got tired of watching founders with great things to say post nothing because turning a recording into content is a slog, and generic AI clippers make everyone sound the same.
So I’m building a tool made just for founders: you give it one recording — a podcast episode, a talk, or even a long voice note — and it writes you a week of posts in your actual voice.
X, LinkedIn, and a newsletter.
Not clipper slop. Tuned for how founders actually talk.
It’s early, and I’m not charging yet. What I need is proof the output is genuinely good from real founders, instead of just my own opinion.
The deal: send me a recording you’ve done, and I’ll turn it into a full week of posts for free.
You keep whatever you want and owe me nothing. All I ask is one honest line on whether it was any good.
First 5 founders. Comment or DM me.
I like that you're validating the outcome manually before trying to automate it.
The interesting challenge isn't generating more founder content—it's making founders feel like they could have written it themselves. If users spend half their time rewriting the output, the bottleneck hasn't actually moved.
Totally agree, and honestly, that’s the whole bet.
Volume is the easy part. Nobody needs more generic founder content. The only thing that matters is whether it reads like you actually said it.
The way I’m going at that is anchoring every post on your own verbatim words from the recording, not a paraphrase, and matching voice from a sample of your own writing.
The goal is that the strongest line in a post is something you literally said, so there’s nothing to rewrite.
And you named the exact bar I’m judging it on. If someone has to rewrite half of it, the bottleneck hasn’t moved, and it failed.
Still early and testing whether it clears that for real. Appreciate you cutting straight to the actual problem.
Interesting.
Reading your reply made me think less about matching someone's writing style and more about what the product quietly commits itself to once users stop editing the output.
I don't think I can explain that line of reasoning properly in a thread without oversimplifying it.
If you're open to it, what's the best email to reach you on?
Yeah, I'm curious where you're taking this. You can reach me at saihaneeshkarawalla@gmail.com.
Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.