Our latest validator allows you to add schematron-based validation to your workflows. This blog post provides an example from the world of metrology.
https://validibot.com/blog/schematron-support-in-validibot/
I'm curious what convinced you expanding validation capabilities is a stronger growth driver than making existing validation easier to adopt.
Have you found customers asking for broader standards support first, or do they usually struggle more with integrating validation into their workflows in the first place?