A month ago, a friend asked me to look at her YouTube channel. She's a great writer — thoughtful blog posts, sharp opinions — but her channel had 4 videos and 89 subscribers. "I know video is where the growth is," she said. "I just can't make it happen."
I told her I'd turn one of her blog posts into a video for her. Just one, as a favor.
That favor turned into a month-long experiment, and honestly, it's taught me more about content creation than the three years I spent writing articles.
Why I started doing this
I'm building an AI video tool for creators — the kind that takes a blog post and turns it into a narrated video, or cuts a 40-minute podcast into clips you can actually post. But instead of sitting in my room guessing what features people want, I decided to do the thing myself: make videos for real creators, for free, and see what actually happens.
No catch. No up sell. I just wanted to understand, from the inside, what making video actually costs people — in time, in energy, in confidence.
What I learned
Everyone's bottleneck is the same: the blank page.
The creators I worked with didn't struggle with editing. They didn't struggle with equipment. They struggled with the moment before starting — "What do I even make? How do I start?" Half my job turned out to be just showing them a first draft. Once something existed, they could finally see what was wrong with it and fix it. Before that, they couldn't even start.
"Good enough" is a legitimate strategy.
One creator I worked with had a 3-hour podcast she'd recorded but never published because "it wasn't cut properly." We turned it into 4 short clips in an evening. She posted them, got more engagement in a week than in the previous 6 months. The clips weren't perfect. They were good enough — and they existed.
Creators don't realize how much content they're sitting on.
Blog posts, old livestreams, interview recordings, webinar Q&As — every creator I talked to had a graveyard of content they'd already made and forgotten. Turning existing content into video isn't about creating more; it's about unearthing what's already there. This changed how I think about the tool entirely.
The feedback loop is everything.
The creators who posted their videos and got responses — even small ones — kept going. The ones who posted into silence stopped. Retention isn't a features problem. It's a "did anyone see this" problem.
What I'm doing now
I've done 7 videos so far — 3 blog-to-video, 2 podcast clips, 2 long-video-to-Shorts. Each one taught me something I couldn't have learned from a survey or a feature request.
This week I'm doing a few more, for whoever wants one. If you're a creator — You Tuber, pod caster, blogger, course creator — and there's a video sitting in your head (or in your draft folder) that you keep meaning to make, I'd be happy to make it for you. You keep the video, and I get to learn from how it goes.
If you've tried one of these AI video tools before and they fell short — or if you have a specific kind of content you've always wanted turned into video — I'd genuinely love to hear what happened. That's the kind of thing I'm trying to understand.
The “graveyard of existing content” finding seems more commercially interesting than generic AI video creation. Across the 7 videos, did repurposing existing material lead to repeat publishing, or was the value mostly getting creators past the first video?
Great question — that's the thing I've been thinking about most since starting this.
From what I saw, it's mostly the second one: getting creators past the first video. Repurposing works really well as a starting point — it lowers the bar from "I need to create something new" to "let's just bring this thing I already made back to life." But did they keep publishing after that? Mixed. A couple of them did — once they saw a finished video of their own content, they wanted more. The rest went back to their old habits, because the bottleneck was never the tool, it was the "where do I even start" moment.
The part that surprised me: even the ones who didn't continue said the first video changed how they saw their backlog. They stopped treating old posts as "dead content" and started seeing them as raw material. That shift might matter more than the video itself.
That “where do I even start” bottleneck is interesting. I’d be curious to dig into what makes the creators who kept publishing different. If you’re open to it, what’s the best email to reach you on?
Honestly, the difference wasn't the tool or the workflow — it was whether they had a reason to keep going. The ones who continued were the ones who saw a small win fast: one posted a clip that got a surprising amount of engagement, the other was using video as part of a bigger launch, so the deadline kept them moving. The ones who stopped weren't lazy — they just didn't have that next trigger. The first video proved it was possible; it didn't create the habit by itself.
Happy to share more — you can reach me at brianbradleyiu59@gmail.com. Would genuinely love to hear what you're working on too.
Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.