Spent two weeks testing whether people can read my confirmation screens in two seconds. Wrong test. Someone in a thread about AI course-approval gates pointed out why: legibility just tells you someone can read it, not that they'd catch it if it were wrong.
The actual test is uglier to run. Seed a known-wrong state on purpose — a stale calendar slot, a swapped contact, a time that's off by an hour — and watch whether a real person catches it before they hit confirm, not whether they can parse the sentence.
I have zero of these tests built yet. I've been polishing readability on a screen I've never once tried to trick a real person with.
Rebuilding the test process before I ship any more confirmation UI. If anyone's built adversarial test cases like this for a critical-action screen — wrong contact, wrong amount, wrong time — I want to know what actually got caught vs. what people confirmed anyway.
Curious how long it took before you saw the first real results?
This is useful. How are you finding your first users so far?
Really relatable. How much time do you put into this each week?
Interesting. How are you measuring whether it is working?