
I kept hearing the same thing from customers:
They were sending proposals, pitch decks, and other client-facing docs through DocBeacon, but the viewing experience still felt like my product instead of their brand.
That matters more than it sounds.
If someone is sending a high-value proposal, they don’t want the recipient thinking about the software behind it. They want the focus to stay on their company, their credibility, and their document.
So I built shared document branding.
Pro users can now add:
And I apply that branding throughout the document viewing experience:
A few implementation details:
The hardest part was balancing flexibility with security.
Letting users attach their own URLs sounds simple, but I definitely didn’t want to allow things like:
So a lot of the real work went into defining what counts as a “safe” branding input, not just rendering a logo on screen.
One thing I like about this feature: it makes the product less visible in the right way.
For this use case, that’s exactly the job.
Happy to answer questions about the architecture, validation logic, or product decisions.
If you want to check it out, it’s at https://docbeacon.io
nice who are you targeting to use this white label feature? I like how you are transparent with your Plans & Limits rather than surprises later on.
Thanks! I’m targeting sales teams, founders, and law firms where document authority is everything, DocBeacon stays invisible so their brand takes the lead.
I also believe transparent pricing is the fastest way to build trust with professional users.