9
7 Comments

Landing page and product docs for a serverless message queue SaaS - feedback welcome

This is my first foray into SaaS - and I keep getting told that early feedback is the way to go.

I published the landing page and product documentations for a serverless message queue SaaS that I am working on - pushmq.com.

The service works over HTTP. You push messages to PushMQ with a few configuration details along with where to send your message. PushMQ sends the message where you want it - when you want it.

Pushing a message is as simple as sending an HTTP request to:
https://task.pushmq.com/example.com/a/long/path?_pmq_auth=<a_secret_access_token>&your_params...

For this, PushMQ will immediately send a request to https://example.com/a/long/path&your_params...

The product documentation outlines features that I, as a developer, would like to see in a SaaS offering of this kind.

The product targets serverless applications where maintaining the infrastructure behind a message queue is either counter intuitive or in some cases, impossible.

Bonus: This helps in bringing async design in all those shared hosting applications as well.

In my early days, as a young freelance web/php developer, I constantly felt the itch that I couldn't do heavy lifting in my applications without compromising UX. If I needed to, I would have to deploy infrastructure behind it, which was almost always impossible to maintain with the little budget we would get.

Want to resize an image - make the user wait!

Even today, message queues haven't evolved much in the face of serverless infrastructure. If I have to poll a service to get new messages, I don't believe it's truly serverless!

PushMQ is my answer to that!

Note: the task.pushmq.com subdomain is not active yet

posted to Icon for group Developers
Developers
on August 9, 2022
  1. 2

    Nice idea, queues is definitely something that's currently missing with a lot of popular hosting services.

    A few ideas to improve your design.

    • In the header nav; Checkout the docs, just name this Documentation
    • Add a real code example to show how easy it really is, and give a live example that updates something on the site, like showing confetti after a push.
    • Add some icons above the benefits to add some more character to the site
    • The description under pricing is one really long line on large screens, add a new line to make it easier to read.
    • Place the name/email/subscribe button under eachother and perhaps add a border/background to the form to give the site a little more dept.
    • Copyright still says 2020, I might get the idea this project is abandonded already.
    1. 1

      @Eelco thank you for the detailed review.

      All these are good points - let me look into them.

      I haven't really given thought to giving code examples on the landing page. Sounds promising. It will probably help visitors in understanding and will also act as a nice segway to the docs (where the code examples actually are)

      A live example is going to be a little more difficult, since I haven't actually put this up in a publicly accessible server yet! Warrants a bit of thought.

      I was wondering what I had missed. Turns out it was the copyright year

  2. 2

    A shout-out to @markosaric for the incredible plausible.io service. Integration was a breeze - and instant data. Thank you for your work.

  3. 1

    Feedback from a design angle made after looking at it for 1 second: My eye is not sure where to go. The "Message Queue for serverless", the primary button and the screenshot on the left are battling for attention. I would strive for a clear 1-2-3 hierarchy here, depending on what you consider most important.

    1. 2

      Thank you for the design angle. Really need input on that.

      UI has never been my strong suite.

      I will have another go at it.

      Thanks

    2. 1

      @blackbrokkoli I updated the landing page and removed the screenshot along with updating the font size of the header.

      1. 1

        Nice! IMO definitely better from a design angle.

        Without any images it looks very tech-y (like I am on the start page of software docs, as opposed to the sleek look a marketing startup or whatever might have), but honestly that might be just right for your audience (which I would presume is highly technical).

        I think your next step is to get someone's eyes on it who is in your target group - never used serverless so not me sadly ;)

Trending on Indie Hackers
AI runs 70% of my distribution. The exact stack. User Avatar 74 comments Show IH: I'm building a lead gen + CRM tool for web designers targeting local businesses without websites — starting with Spain User Avatar 69 comments I'm a solo founder. It took me 9 months and at least 3 stack rewrites to ship my SaaS. User Avatar 60 comments I built a URL indexing SaaS in 40 days — here's the honest story User Avatar 56 comments We witnessed a sharp spike in our traffic. So much happiness after a long time. User Avatar 15 comments We could see our AI bill, but not explain it — so I built AiKey User Avatar 11 comments