Some of you saw the shared-inbox teardown I posted here last week. Same engine, now launched properly.
Bersyn asks ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini the questions your buyers actually ask, several times each, then shows you who got recommended, who got named instead of you, and the verbatim answers. Free, no signup, you just type a domain.
It came from an uncomfortable moment. I ran those questions on my own company and all four models recommended my competitors. Not because the product was worse. They had no idea I existed for that job. That turns out to be most of us.
The finding that still surprises me most: I ran an email platform test, 10 runs across 4 models, 40 answers. Ask "what's the best email marketing platform" and Mailchimp gets named 39 out of 40 while Beehiiv gets 4, all of them from Perplexity. Rephrase to describe the job instead of the category, "how does a creator start a newsletter and make money from it", and Beehiiv jumps to 29 of 40. Claude and Perplexity name it every single run. ChatGPT names it zero times out of ten on both questions.
Same product, same models, same afternoon. The only thing that changed was whether the question described a category or a job.
Here it is if you want to look: https://www.producthunt.com/products/bersyn/launches/bersyn-2
Honest takes welcome, including the critical ones. Someone on Reddit spent an hour this morning telling me everything wrong with my landing page and it was the most useful thing that happened all day. That's the kind I want.
The thing I keep going back and forth on: per-model breakdown, or one blended score and a to-do list? I think one number hides the real problem, since you can own an intent on three models and be invisible on the fourth. But I might be overcomplicating it.