Launched Postessia today — an AI tool that writes LinkedIn posts in your actual voice (not generic AI-speak)
Launched Postessia today — an AI tool that writes LinkedIn posts in your actual voice (not generic AI-speak)
Hey founders ,
Live today: Postessia (postessia.in) — AI-powered LinkedIn content that sounds like you, not like every other AI post you've learned to scroll past.
Why I built this:
I kept seeing the same problem — founders and agency owners know consistent LinkedIn posting drives leads, but every AI writing tool produces the same flat, "unlock your potential 🚀" voice. You can spot AI content from a mile away now, and readers have started tuning it out.
So instead of "generate a post about X," Postessia analyzes how you actually write — your rhythm, your directness, the phrases you'd naturally use — and generates posts from that. Two-stage pipeline: first it builds a voice profile from your existing writing, then a planner→drafter→auditor loop checks every draft against that profile before it ships. If a draft doesn't sound like you, it gets rewritten before you ever see it.
What's live:
Free tier — 5 posts/month, no card needed
Solo — ₹599/mo
Founder — ₹1,499/month
What's not live yet: Agency/team plans — waitlist only for now. Didn't want to ship something half-built just to have more tiers on the pricing page.
I'm doing outreach manually right now (no automation, no bought lists) — genuinely trying to find people for whom this solves a real problem, not just chase signups. If you're an agency owner or founder who's given up on LinkedIn because you don't have time to write, I'd love your honest feedback — good or brutal.
postessia.in
Happy to answer anything about the build, the voice-matching approach, or why I skipped the "unlimited posts" pricing trap.
You're pointing at a real problem. People can smell "AI voice" immediately now, and most tools still optimize for volume instead of preserving the weird little phrasing that makes someone sound like themselves. One thing that helped me with DictaFlow was treating rough input as sacred for as long as possible. Capture the thought in the person's natural rhythm first, then clean it up, not rewrite it. If Postessia keeps that discipline, the product will feel a lot different from the generic post generators.
"Your tiers already think in stages, you just haven't tested them against one"
Good catch above on the ICP gap. I'd push one layer further. Free → Solo → ₹1,499 Founder is already a stage ladder, you just built it on instinct. The open question: is a 2-person Indian agency at pre-seed actually going to absorb ₹1,499/mo before they've landed 3 retainer clients, or does that tier only make sense once they're Seed-stage with 8-10 clients? That's the kind of thing that's hard to gut-check alone — worth mapping your tiers against actual company-stage spend patterns before you lock the agency tier pricing.
Honestly, fair challenge — I built the ladder on instinct (Free → Solo → Founder tracking typical agency growth), not on actual spend data yet. My guess is you're right that a pre-seed 2-person shop probably starts at Solo, not Founder, and grows into it once they've got retainer clients to justify workspace/reporting features. But that's a hypothesis, not something I've validated. Going to watch which tier early signups actually pick and revisit in a few weeks with real data instead of guessing further. Appreciate you pushing on it
Exactly. Here's the shortcut: list Postessia on SoftRankings (stage-fit tool directory). You get founder traffic pre-segmented by stage — Pre-seed separate from Seed separate from Series A. Watch which tier each cohort picks in week 1, not weeks. Saves guessing.
Here is a sample analytics page from Inssist on SoftRankings : https://softrankings.com/products/inssist/analytics
Appreciate this, will get Postessia listed there. Good instinct on watching cohort behavior by stage instead of guessing — that's basically what I'm doing internally too, just needed a cleaner way to track it. Thanks for digging in twice now.
Wow, you already launched on SoftRankings? Congratulations mate!
https://softrankings.com/products/postessia
Ran your landing page and one thing's worth flagging above all: your post pitches "founders and agency owners" broadly, but the page is built specifically for Indian agencies. ₹ pricing, "Desi Grind" tone, "Built for India." That's your sharpest wedge, but the two don't match. "AI writes LinkedIn posts in your voice" competes with 50 tools. "LinkedIn content for Indian agencies" competes with almost none. The India angle is the moat, lead with it everywhere, including here.
Second flag: your strongest features (client workspaces, approval queue, white-label reports) are all agency features, but locked to the priciest Founder tier. Your actual buyer pays the most to get the thing built for them. Worth rethinking.
Voice-matching is table stakes now. The Indian-agency angle is the real story. Who's the first agency that paid, and which tone did they pick?
Appreciate you actually digging into the page instead of just skimming the post — this is the kind of feedback that's useful.
On the positioning gap — you're right, and it's the sharper insight here. I built the product with Indian agencies as the real ICP, but the post copy defaulted to broader "founders and agency owners" language instead of leading with the actual wedge. That's a messaging gap, not a product gap, and it's an easy fix — headline and above-fold need to say "Indian agencies" explicitly instead of implying it through ₹ pricing and "Desi Grind" tone. Fixing that this week.
On the feature-tier point — this one I'll push back on slightly. Client workspaces, approval queue, and white-label reports are locked to Founder tier deliberately: an agency handling even 8-10 clients is looking at ₹2,999+/month value easily, so the tier is priced against agency-scale usage, not against a solo creator's willingness to pay. That said, those specific features are still in development, launching soon — so right now it's more of a roadmap commitment than a live mismatch. Once they ship, I'll be watching if agencies actually convert into Founder tier at that price point or if the tier needs adjusting. Real signal over assumption.
Good push on both fronts, first one's getting fixed now.