I recently launched WeDoDev — a subscription-based SaaS development service for startups and small teams.
The goal is to give founders ongoing product development (features, integrations, UX improvements, iteration) without hiring or managing freelancers or agencies.
I’m exploring whether early-stage SaaS teams prefer this model over traditional agencies or contractors.
Would love feedback from founders here — especially what you'd expect from a service like this.
Website: https://www.wedodev.co/
Clean positioning. Ongoing product development without hiring friction is attractive for early teams.
Since you’ll likely get access to client codebases, databases, and sometimes production environments, security expectations will be high.
A few things founders will want clarity on:
• How do you handle access to client repos and infrastructure? Dedicated accounts per engineer, no shared credentials?
• Are you signing DPAs or NDAs by default?
• How do you isolate client projects internally to prevent cross-client data exposure?
• What happens to access when a subscription ends? Is there a formal offboarding checklist?
If you’re positioning this as an alternative to agencies, operational maturity and security hygiene will matter as much as delivery speed.
We’re the Nautillo Pro security team, so we naturally look at access control and isolation risks. We built Nautillo Pro for founders and teams who care about web app security and want to test their applications from an external attacker perspective. There’s a free version available, with DNS ownership validation required so only legitimate owners can run simulations.
Clear security processes could become a strong trust signal for your service.
Hi, thanks so much for the comment. I'll check your service out