1
1 Comment

Lintract Week 2: 40 cold emails, 0 replies, 98 homepage visits. Here's what the data actually says.

Two weeks in. Still no sales. But the numbers are starting to tell a story.

What happened this week:

  • 20 more cold emails sent (shifted from staffing agencies to construction contractors and healthcare staffing)
  • 3 Reddit replies (shadowbanned on new account, building karma)
  • 2 tweets
  • Shipped the VIN model: first red flag visible before payment
  • Improved privacy messaging and hero layout based on IH feedback

The analytics (2 weeks total):

  • 98 homepage visits
  • 30 visits to /analyze (31% conversion from landing to upload page)
  • 8 visits to /results pages (people actually ran analyses)
  • Blog posts getting some traction: Fiverr analysis, Upwork analysis

The 31% landing → analyze conversion is actually decent. The drop is at payment.

What I learned this week:

Cold email to staffing agencies = wrong motion for a $12 impulse buy. Multiple people said it here, and the silence confirmed it. Shifted to construction and healthcare contractors — higher WTP, more direct pain.

The IH post from week 1 drove most of the traffic. Reddit is blocked by karma wall. Twitter is too new to matter yet.

The real insight: people are visiting, some are running analyses, nobody is paying. That's a conversion problem, not a traffic problem. The next two weeks are about finding where the pain is live enough to trigger a $12 impulse decision.

Week 3 plan: double down on intent-based channels. Find the person holding the contract right now.

lintract.com

on June 12, 2026
  1. 1

    I see the conversion math you're working through — 98 visits, 31% hit the analyze step, $0 paid. That's a specific wall: the people willing to try aren't converting to pay.

    One thing jumped out on the LP: your only social proof before the $12 ask is "Trusted by freelancers in the US, India, and 40+ countries." That's geography. For someone being asked to upload an actual contract to a tool they've never heard of, geography doesn't answer "has this worked for someone like me?"

    The fix is one string change — swap it for your real analysis number or a real quote:

    Before: "Trusted by freelancers in the US, India, and 40+ countries."

    After (option A — use your actual dashboard count): "[X] contracts analyzed · Trusted by freelancers in 40+ countries"

    After (option B — if you have a quote from this thread or email): "'Found a clause that would have cost me the entire project.' — Freelancer, US"

    Either version answers "has this worked?" in the same space. One edit, no design work.

    If the other gaps (hero promise vs. privacy friction, the $12 ask without a free entry point) are worth addressing together: https://outboundautonomy.com/fix-sprint

Trending on Indie Hackers
I built a startup-idea scanner. It just told me none of my 3,400 ideas are easy wins. User Avatar 77 comments “I’ll just post on Upwork” is not a client strategy. Here’s what I built instead. User Avatar 60 comments Building a Shopify bundles app for stores with real fulfillment: here's the wedge User Avatar 42 comments I recorded myself using 200+ indie SaaS products cold. Here are the 7 conversion killers that keep showing up. User Avatar 34 comments The Capture Trap User Avatar 33 comments How to automate refund reviews without giving AI the final say User Avatar 29 comments