Looking for 5 agencies to try Tweak on a real client project
I've spent the last few weeks talking to agencies and web teams about the client-review stage of website projects.
One thing keeps coming up:
The problem isn't just collecting feedback. It's getting that feedback from the client → QA → developer → resolution without all the back-and-forth.
A client sends a screenshot.
Then another message.
Then someone asks which page they're talking about.
Then the developer needs clarification.
Then QA checks it.
Then the client comes back with another revision.
So I built Tweak around that handoff.
The client opens the actual staging website, clicks the element they want changed and leaves the feedback directly there.
The team can then turn it into trackable work, assign it, move it through QA/development and resolve it.
I'm also building the developer side of the workflow with MCP/Cursor, because I don't want Tweak to stop at "collecting comments."
I'm looking for 5 agencies/freelancers to try it on a real project.
Ideally, you:
- build websites for clients
- regularly send staging/preview links for review
- deal with client revisions/QA
- have a project currently going through review
I'll personally help you set it up and run the first review.
I'm not looking for people to just sign up and give me generic feedback. I want to see whether Tweak actually makes a real client project easier to manage.
If you have a project in this stage right now, comment below or DM me.
I'll set it up with you.
The real-project requirement makes this test much more useful than generic beta feedback. What metric will tell you Tweak actually improved the review cycle—fewer clarification rounds, faster resolution, or less agency coordination time?