1
3 Comments

Looking for a few engineers to help test a lightweight PR review tool

Hey folks đź‘‹

I’m one of the founders of Hikaflow. We’re building a lightweight tool that acts as a second pass on pull requests, helping with code review, testing signals, and other repetitive engineering checks, especially for individuals and small teams.

We’re at a stage where the product is ready, but instead of launching broadly, we want to learn directly from real engineers working on real code.

Right now, we’re looking for:

  1. Solo developers or small teams
  2. Active GitHub projects (public or private)
  3. People who use PRs regularly and move fast

This is not a pitch, and there’s no obligation. The goal is simply:

  1. You try it on a real PR
  2. We see what works, what doesn’t
  3. You give brutally honest feedback

If this sounds interesting, comment here 'Interested', happy to share more context or answer questions.

Appreciate this community a lot, and excited to learn from you all.

posted to Icon for group Developers
Developers
on January 6, 2026
  1. 1

    PR review tooling is genuinely one of those workflows where small friction losses stack up fast — context switching from code → review UI → comments → diff view is surprisingly costly in cognitive load.

    Curious — as you’re thinking about testing, are you focusing on specific behaviors like:
    • reducing time to give a first review pass
    • reducing the total number of context switches per PR
    • or improving clarity of review comments (less rework)

    Tools can look elegant in isolation, but what developers really care about is whether they reduce real friction in daily code reviews. What signal(s) are you watching first to decide this tool is actually helping?

    1. 1

      Ideally, it allows teams to reduce their Code Review, Testing, and Debugging time from days to minutes. By the way, here is a link: https://app.hikaflow.com

      Why don't you try it in your workflow and share anything you find meaningful?

      1. 1

        That makes sense as the long-term goal.

        When you’ve had engineers test it so far, what’s been the first concrete signal that told you “this is working”?

        For example:

        • first review completed without switching back to GitHub UI
        • fewer back-and-forth comment cycles on the same PR
        • reviewers finishing a pass in one sitting instead of spreading it over time

        I’ve found those early behavioral shifts usually show up well before dramatic time reductions.

Trending on Indie Hackers
I'm a lawyer who launched an AI contract tool on Product Hunt today — here's what building it as a non-technical founder actually felt like User Avatar 142 comments “This contract looked normal - but could cost millions” User Avatar 54 comments A simple way to keep AI automations from making bad decisions User Avatar 52 comments 👉 The most expensive contract mistakes don’t feel risky User Avatar 41 comments Never hire an SEO Agency for your Saas Startup User Avatar 40 comments The indie maker's dilemma: 2 months in, 700 downloads, and I'm stuck User Avatar 40 comments