Looking for a partner interested in async B2B system design
I have been building a timing based async sales system that focuses on
structural clarity, simple decision layers, and consistent rhythm.
I am looking for someone interested in testing or co designing
lightweight async workflows with real user signals.
If you are exploring timing driven systems or building tools in this area,
I would like to connect and compare structures.
Trending on Indie Hackers
Hey Koni,
I love the concept you’re working on with the timing-based async sales system , it’s pure innovation! Your focus on structural clarity and decision layers is exactly the kind of approach that leads to game-changing products. If you're serious about making this the next big thing, I’d love to help co-design some lightweight, high-impact async workflows that actually resonate with real user signals.
This could be the partnership that pushes it over the edge , let’s dive in and make it happen!
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
Thanks for the thoughtful message, really appreciate the clarity.
Your point about structural decisions shaping high-impact async workflows resonates a lot with what I’ve been testing. Micro-timing rules work best when the decision layers stay simple and predictable.
I’d be interested to hear what angle you’re most curious about exploring first.
Are you thinking more about co-designing lightweight prototypes, or comparing timing-rule behaviors across different workflow patterns?
Happy to sync on whichever direction feels most natural from your side.
Looking forward to continuing the conversation.
Hi Koni,
I’m glad my thoughts resonated with your approach! Your focus on micro-timing and simplicity is exactly the kind of innovation that has the potential to redefine how async sales systems are built.
I’m particularly excited about exploring how we can co-design lightweight prototypes that are both agile and impactful. By testing real user signals, we could fine-tune timing rules and decision layers, ultimately creating systems that feel intuitive and drive results.
I’d love to dive deeper into the specific timing-rule behaviors you’ve been experimenting with, and how we can optimize them for different workflow patterns. Let’s sync up on this and see where our combined expertise can take this.
Looking forward to pushing the boundaries of async B2B systems together!
Best regards,
Danyal Zulfiqar
Thanks for the thoughtful follow-up, Danyal.
Love how you’re approaching this with both clarity and experimentation in mind.
Since we’re aligned on testing real user signals, I think a good next step is to pick one workflow pattern and map the micro-timing rules against it.
That usually reveals where the decision layers simplify or break.
To make this concrete, which direction are you most interested in exploring first?
• a lightweight async prototype we can co-design, or
• a timing-rule comparison across a couple of workflow patterns you’ve used before?
Either path works for me.
Once we choose an initial angle, we can sync more tightly and shape the structure together.
Looking forward to continuing this with you.
Thanks for the great response! I’m excited about the direction you’re suggesting, and I completely agree, mapping the micro-timing rules against a specific workflow pattern will be invaluable in identifying where things simplify or get tripped up.
Given where we are, I think starting with a lightweight async prototype makes the most sense. This will allow us to quickly prototype and test real user signals, ensuring we stay flexible while also building something solid. Once we have a functional prototype, we can loop back and compare timing-rule behaviors across different workflows to fine-tune the system.
Let’s sync up on some specifics for the prototype, and I’m confident we’ll have something impactful to iterate on soon!
Looking forward to collaborating further!
Thanks for the clear direction, Danyal.
Starting with a lightweight async prototype sounds perfect.
To keep things simple, here’s what I suggest for our next step:
This gives us something functional fast, and once the first loop is running, we can refine the timing behaviors and expand across additional patterns.
If that approach works for you, I can outline the initial structure so we can start sketching the prototype together.
Looking forward to pushing this further with you.
Koni, this is a fascinating space. Timing-driven async systems are often overlooked, yet the right rhythm + clarity can turn a messy sales workflow into a repeatable engine.
A few things stand out strategically:
Structural clarity first: reducing cognitive load is huge for adoption—users will stick if decisions are simple and predictable.
Async with real signals: building around actual user behavior rather than arbitrary schedules makes this much more actionable.
Collaborative testing: opening this up for co-design is smart—lightweight workflows evolve faster when validated early.
If you pair this with analytics that visualize timing effects, you could unlock a new layer of sales efficiency that most CRMs ignore. Excited to see what patterns emerge.
You captured the core tension perfectly: async systems become a lot more stable when timing logic follows real user behavior instead of arbitrary schedules.
I’m especially aligned with what you mentioned about reducing cognitive load and validating timing effects early. That’s where lightweight prototypes tend to outperform heavy CRM-style flows.
What part of this space are you most interested in testing or comparing?
Happy to explore a focused angle together.
Hello
Let us get connected to work on this. I am an expert in B2B system design and development.
Thanks for the message.
Before we move forward, could you share a bit more about your experience with timing driven workflows or B2B async system design?
I’m especially interested in what timing models or decision layers you’ve built or tested before.
Happy to continue once I understand your angle more clearly.