Looking for honest feedback on a new way to reduce tool overload
I’m looking for honest feedback on something I’ve been building.
Like many of you, I kept struggling with context switching — email, Slack, calendar, docs, tasks, meetings… everything scattered. So I built a small internal tool to bring it into one place.
It’s early and rough around the edges, and I’m not trying to sell anything — I just want to learn whether this actually helps or if I’m solving the wrong problem.
If you’re open to testing it and telling me what works / doesn’t, I’d really appreciate it.
Here’s the link:
https://omnex.tech
I really like how you’re tackling tool overload, ÓMNEX. The key seems to be that you’re not trying to replace every app, but reducing friction when resuming tasks. That can be very valuable if you can measure real-time and clarity savings.
A suggestion: consider adding some context-switch tracking (how often a user jumps between apps or docs) and use it as a KPI to validate that your tool truly reduces context switching. This would give you objective data to evaluate adoption and willingness to pay.
I love the website, it's very professional, congratulations!
Tool overload is universal, I use 12 different tools just to run my startup.
But here's the trap: everyone complains about it, but will they PAY to switch? Tool fatigue ≠ purchase intent. I learned this the hard way with my first idea.
Before you build, have you validated people will actually pay for this vs just complaining about it?
I built FounderOS to check market demand vs just "nice to have" problems. Happy to validate this for you in 3 mins, might save you building something people want but won't pay for.
DM me or drop the concept here?
Totally fair pushback — tool fatigue isn’t purchase intent.
We’re validating “pay” by targeting teams where context loss has a direct cost: missed handoffs, slow re-entry after interruptions, and repeated rework (especially in async/dev workflows). The wedge isn’t “replace Slack/Notion/Jira” — it’s becoming the default re-orientation surface when someone comes back to a task, so they stop reopening 5 tools just to remember what’s going on. If we can measurably reduce time-to-clarity and cross-tool hopping for real teams, that’s the value that earns budget (and if we can’t, we’ll stop).
Happy to share what we’re tracking + what early testers are seeing. Also open to a quick demand check — drop whatever questions you’d use to stress-test willingness to pay.
check https://omnex.tech and fill the early access form , and you will have the link of the app . (no credit, no pay) .
Perfect—let's do that demand check right now.
I built FounderOS specifically for this. I'll validate your "tool overload" concept against real market data (competition, search trends, and willingness to pay) and give you a GO/ITERATE/KILL verdict.
Takes 3 mins. Just need:
Drop it here, or DM me on Twitter @FoundersOS and I'll run it now.
-What specific problem are you solving?
context loss with teams and companies using many tools for daily work.
-Who pays?
teams, company owner, and individuals.
-How do you make money?
per user , with 4 tires (free, team, company, enterprise ) , to have s better idea about pricing please check https://omnex.tech .