2
1 Comment

Month 2 building in public — $572 MRR and viral growth is a trap

Viral growth is overrated. there, i said it.

Everyone's chasing the product hunt spike, the X thread that blows up, the hacker news front page. and yeah, it feels good for 48 hours.
Then churn eats it alive and you're back to zero wondering what happened.

Month 2 update. solo founder, building publicly, figuring it out as I go.

What went well:
• $572 MRR after 2 months building www.redditgrow.ai . No viral moment. No big launch.
• shipped an AI detection feature that tells you when your startup shows up in AI-generated responses. tbh this one surprised me, people are way more interested in this than I expected.
• consistent daily signups, nothing explosive, just steady

What didn't:
• still haven't cracked a repeatable acquisition channel. Most signups I can't even attribute properly.
• churn is real. at 10% monthly it's a math problem that gets uncomfortable fast if I stop adding users.
• spent too much time on the new feature and not enough time talking to the users I already have. classic mistake.
• some days I wonder if i'm building what people actually want or just what I think they want

Current numbers:
• MRR: $572
• Month: 2
• Churn: ~10% monthly (the thing i lose sleep over)

Next focus:
• get on calls with current paying users before shipping anything else
• figure out which acquisition channel is actually working vs. which one I just feel good about
• run the 1 customer per day math and see if i can get remotely close to it

fwiw the math is simple. 1 new customer a day at $19/month, even with 10% churn, gets you to roughly $4k MRR in 12 months. no virality needed. Just don't stop.

I started this because I got burned by inconsistent growth before. the founders who win aren't the ones who spike. they're the ones still here in month 14.

What's the longest you've gone without a new signup before it started messing with your head?

on June 2, 2026
  1. 1

    The underrated signal here is that your new AI-detection feature surprised you.

    That usually means the market is pulling you toward a sharper promise than the one you started with.

    If people are more interested in “when does my startup show up in AI answers?” than generic Reddit growth, I’d be careful not to treat that as just another feature. That might be the wedge.

    The acquisition problem may become easier if the product is not framed as “grow on Reddit,” but closer to:

    “Track where your startup is being mentioned, recommended, or missed across Reddit and AI answers.”

    That gives you a stronger reason to talk to paying users now. Not just “how did you find us?” but:

    What were you actually trying to monitor when you paid?
    Reddit conversations?
    AI visibility?
    Competitors?
    Mentions?
    Lead opportunities?

    The 1 customer/day math only works if the channel is tied to the sharpest buying reason. Right now, I’d spend less time chasing broad distribution and more time finding which pain creates the $19/month decision fastest.

    Happy to write a tighter channel/retention breakdown if useful. This is exactly the kind of month-two problem where a simple 7-day test plan can save a lot of random shipping.

Trending on Indie Hackers
Your build-in-public audience is not your market. I learned the difference the slow way. User Avatar 257 comments Most founders don't have a product problem. They have a visibility problem User Avatar 59 comments Day 4: Why I Built a $199 Workspace Nobody Asked For User Avatar 39 comments How to automatically turn customer feedback into high-converting testimonials User Avatar 39 comments Built a "stocks as football cards" thing. 5 days in, my launch tweet got 7 views. What am I missing? User Avatar 34 comments Spent months building LazyEats AI. Spent 1 day realizing I have no idea how to get users. User Avatar 29 comments