Most QR codes work. The problem is nobody notices them.

"They work but nobody scans" is a real insight. One thing I'd add from watching people ignore them: it's usually less about the code looking boring and more about the moment — a QR gets scanned only when the person already wants what's on the other side, has a free hand, and 3 seconds. The best-performing ones pair the code with a reason in about four words ("scan for the recipe," "menu here"), right where the wanting happens. Does NG QRCode let you test the call-to-action text next to the code, not just the code's design? That might be a stronger selling point than aesthetics.

Yes, QR codes should be diverse, personalized, and pleasing to the eye, rather than being uniformly black and white.

Congrats on the launch!

Making QR codes more engaging is a cool angle — but adoption usually depends on whether it directly improves scan rates or outcomes.

The buyers here are typically businesses thinking in terms of conversion (events, menus, campaigns).

Feels like there’s an opportunity to anchor this more directly to “get more scans” rather than aesthetics.

Have you seen any measurable difference in engagement yet?

That kind of data could make this much easier to sell.

Okay, to start out: I love seeing imagegen QR codes. They can be incredibly artistic and fun if executed well.

That said I must admit that I went back to normal QRs, which - reflecting - isn't a good sign. I would love seeing them everywhere so why don't I gravitate to using them as my go-to?

I think the reason is two fold.

(1) If you fully commit to fully integrating them, people stop recognizing them. We set one up for my mom. She's an artist. The image was an atelier with an easel holding a canvas onto which the QR was drawn as abstract art. 10/10 artistic taste, 2/10 function. She printed it, took it to an exhibit, and people were genuinely shocked when she asked them to scan the picture to get to her website and it worked.

(2) You are not fighting QRs being recognizable. Black and white squares already stick out like a sore thumb. You are fighting people's laziness of taking a phone out of your pocket and scanning a thing, and then the distraction of your CTA against whatever they were doing in the real world.

I still love imagegen for QRs. Something in my brain deeply appreciates seeing the precision/tech of a QR and the artistic "wildness" of imagegen merged. But they are ultimately art added to an otherwise transactional process.

I think your market is high-end luxury and premium business cards. Any place where the "useless" display of value/effort has signaling value.

Just my 2 cents. Hope it helps!

THE ONLY LEGITIMATE BITCOIN RECOVERY EXPERT // HIRE WIZARD GEO COORDINATES RECOVERY HACKER

I had the most terrible moments of my life, a few weeks back when I lost all my savings to a self acclaimed bitcoin investment platform which promised me a massive return on my investment. I was so confused about these scammers, I had to do what everyone in my situation would do, I did some research and came across a lot of Testimonials about WIZARD GEO COORDINATES RECOVERY HACKER. I got to reach out to the expert. It took them 48 hours to help me recover my funds. Bitcoin recovery is very much real. I am a living testimony. Hope this helps as many people who have lost their hard earned money to scammers out of trust, you can reach them through the contact below for help to recover your scammed funds.

WhatsApp +1 ( 318 ) 203-3657

Telegram: @Geocoordinateshacker

This solves a real UX problem. Functionality alone isn't enough—visibility and curiosity matter too. I'd be interested to see A/B test results comparing scan rates between artistic and traditional QR codes.

Honest answer to your question: I don't think anyone prefers scanning pretty codes — scanning is driven by context and incentive, not aesthetics. But that's actually good news for you, because the real value isn't "people like art." It's that an artistic code stops the eye on a poster or a package, where a black-and-white square is invisible noise. I'd position it as "gets noticed in crowded visual contexts" and skip contexts like menus, where people scan because they have to anyway.

One thing I'd add to the landing page: the months you spent on scan reliability are the actual moat, so show the evidence — a tested scan-success rate across devices, angles, and print sizes. That's the first objection any print buyer will raise, and you're the person who solved it; the numbers should be doing that selling for you.

The interesting question seems less whether people say they prefer the artistic version and more what happens when both are actually in front of them.

Have you tested the same destination with a normal QR code vs an NGQRCode and seen whether scan rates actually change?