WordPress.org rotates eight lesser-known plugins into the tab that opens by
default when you go to install anything. No application, no fee. Someone there
picks eight every two weeks. Mine got picked.
Two weeks of the best free distribution I am ever going to get.
I recorded a baseline before it started and logged the numbers daily, because
I could not find a single founder who had been through this and published what
it actually did.
Installs went from 30 to 200.
Then the part I did not expect. The share of those people who ever used the
product went from 50% to 4.8%. In absolute terms: thirteen people used it in
the thirteen days before, twenty-seven during.
Twenty-two times the traffic bought twice the users.
I keep coming back to that one. Not because it is bad news, but because for two
weeks I would have called this a success and been right by every number I would
normally have quoted.
The people were real. Email verification held at the same rate on either side,
so it was not scripts. What changed was why they arrived. Before, somebody
installing had gone looking for what I make. During, they were scanning a list
of eight on a screen WordPress opens by itself.
Discovery and intent are not the same thing, and only one of them shows up in
an install count.
The thing I would tell anyone about to get a spike: decide before it starts
which number would make you call it a success, and make sure that number sits
downstream of the install. Otherwise you get the spike, feel great, and learn
nothing.
All of it is written up, including the half that does not flatter me:
https://queryra.com/blog/wordpress-org-featured-plugin
Has anyone here had a distribution spike and measured what came out the other
end? I have one data point and it is my own, which is the least useful kind.
Nothing clean yet — email verification held at exactly the same rate on both sides, so that one's out. Best candidate is whether they sync a catalogue, since it's the first step that costs them anything.