At my day job, we (engineers) are asked to conduct technical interviews when there are open positions. I have a problem that few other colleagues of mine have faced as well when taking interviews.
We have some guidelines on what to ask, what kind of key points to look for in the answers, etc. But the exact questions are not really written down somewhere. So usually, before the interview, we find some questions from whatever source and then use them in the interview. So the type of question different interviewers ask and depth at which they probe the candidate might vary for the same role.
The other issue is, during the interview, interviewee is constantly explaining his/her thoughts and as an interviewer, I need to focus on listening to him/her. But to be able to create a final feedback after the interview, I need to write down the response as well (so that I don't forget). If I start typing constantly, it ends up making the interviewee nervous and also I lose focus on what he/she is really saying and focus on just typing.
I have an idea to solve this problem (a tool with interview templates + a UX that makes it easy to note down feedback on key areas using single-click).
Do any of you have this issue (In your day job or in your new rapidly expanding startup, etc.)? I am new to indie hacking, so I am not really sure how exactly to validate this (I am trying to contact my peers and understand as well).
Interesting. I work in UX and have had to sit through many (non technical) roles with the same issues. My concern is that once I learned some interview tricks (or someone taught me) - I didnt deal with the same issues. I didn’t need tools as much as experience and mentoring.
That said, I would test this idea with something called a painted door test. (Google it, it’s cool). The gist is you create various ads for this (so far) fake product - I would have each one highlight a specific pain point. You want people who encounter the ad to immediately feel seen, and then you test test test. How many people are clicking? Which pain point gets more traction? What price point makes engagement fall off?
When they click through, I’d have a basic landing page that allows people to sign up to take a short quiz in exchange for being paid something tiny. (Or a discount on future product? Heck - join our research panel!)
And try to figure out what tools they are currently using to solve this particular problem and how well it’s working.
I’d ask questions like, Tell me about a time when you (insert pain point experience). And then shut up long enough for them to just remember and talk. (Side note… also a good interview tactic.)
I’d do some comp analysis on allllll the tools that were mentioned. Down to “pen and paper” if someone used that to fix their problem. I’d look for gaps and opportunities - and common features across all of them and use that to build a quick prototype that I could put in front of users at a super low fidelity.
Then I’d ask people to pay. Landing page? Early life time subscriptions? Dunno. But an exchange of funds is the ultimate test and the faster I could get there the better.
Thanks a lot for responding 🙂.
I talked to couple of my colleagues trying to understand the pain points they faced (I tried to do MOM test kind of approach here. Did not really mention what I was trying to solve or how, but just asked how they go about interviews usually). While almost all of them did mention these as some of the issues they faced, majority of them also said, over time they found out something that works for them (pen-paper, some better way of typing it down, etc.), which is same as your experience.
So I think, I am better off avoiding spending a lot of time/money on this particular idea. I am still thinking of building an MVP of this idea and test it out with a closed group (basically my colleagues where this originated from) and see how they respond.
The painted-door-test is really cool ! Thanks for telling me about it. I will definitely make use of it in evaluating my future ideas.
The only way to find out is to put it out there and see what kind of response you get; alternatively, you might test the waters by providing services based on manual labor first, doing all those automated processes by hand and charging accordingly. Doing so is the only way to prove your theory correct. Small conversation is popular, but as people pull their hands out of their pockets, they forget what they were discussing. Some people may think it's a fine concept, but only if they can benefit monetarily from it. To pass the time, people often engage in idle chatter. Feel free to contact me with any questions.
Thanks for your response. For the problem i have in mind, offering manual labour isn't an option. But i agree on putting it out there and seeing if it sticks. I am parallelly building an MVP as well. I just thought it couldn't hurt to get some feedback from fellow indie hackers in the meantime. 🙂
Perhaps all you need is a landing page where you outline the issue, the solution, the primary advantages, and the value proposition, and a basic UX/UI prototype of the product where you can demonstrate how it's going to operate. Then, you'll be able to utilize a platform like LinkedIn to estimate how many individuals will pay for your services via the direct channel, where we can get you leads. They may make a little down payment and save fifty percent as early adopters, or pay once and get unlimited access for a year. We're here to assist with startup validation in any way we can, so if you need us, simply let us know at www.unicamel.io., we have 4 weeks program for that.
Those are some great tips. Thanks. I have built a landing page already (almost complete). I will soon be sharing it everywhere to see if it gets any interest.
Unicamel sounds like a great platform. I'll check it out.
Sounds nice! Share it with us and we can maybe give some additional tips!
This comment was deleted 3 years ago
Are you talking about job interviews or customer interviews? 🤔 For job interviews, usually the members of the team that has the open position conduct the technical rounds or if that's not possible someone with enough technical experience within the company does.
And the company i work for is not really small business ($40B valuation with more than 70 million MAU)..
This comment was deleted 3 years ago
Ah now I get what you mean. That is definitely an interesting idea. I have zero experience with qualitative research. But I will do some digging and see if I can make use of something from there 🙂
This comment was deleted 3 years ago