One thing users did after launch that surprised me
Something surprised me after launching Smart Cash Sheet.
I expected people to spend most of their time tweaking categories or settings.
Instead, many of them kept going back to future days — not today — and revisiting the same few upcoming moments.
What clicked for me:
People weren’t optimizing. They were rehearsing.
They were mentally asking:
“What happens if I do nothing here?”
“What if I wait?”
“What if this emotion shows up again?”
That changed how I think about financial tools.
Clarity isn’t just about accuracy — it’s about reducing anticipation anxiety.
Curious if other founders have seen users use their product more as a thinking aid than a task tool.
Trending on Indie Hackers
Building is easy. Deciding what not to build is harder.
This feels less like a finance behavior and more like a human one. People don’t just want to know the answer — they want to sit with it before acting.
Revisiting future days sounds like they’re buying time to think, not insights. That’s a subtle but powerful shift in how to judge “engagement.”
Makes me wonder how many products misread this kind of usage as friction instead of relief.
The "rehearsing vs optimizing" distinction is such a sharp observation. Most product analytics would classify that behavior as "confusion" or "low engagement" - users returning to the same screen without taking action. But you caught something deeper: they're using the tool to think, not just to do.
The "anticipation anxiety" framing is valuable. Financial stress isn't just about the present - it's about the weight of uncertainty about the future. A tool that lets people mentally test scenarios ("what if I wait?") is giving them something that spreadsheets technically can but emotionally don't.
This probably explains why some "simple" tools outperform feature-rich competitors. They're not just task completion engines - they're safe spaces for decision rehearsal.