I thought it might be useful to others if I share the previous versions of our landing page that were not converting visitors into signups and the one that started converting at around 10% rate.
Feel free to skip to the last screenshot — the current version that works.
For context, the landing page is for a service that allows early stage startups to collect feedback from their users, act on it, and grow much faster as a result.
(Before our designer joined the team, as you can probably tell)
Main idea: focus on the holy grail of any early stage startup — the product market fit. It's true that startups that actively solicit user feedback are more likely to win so we wanted to speak directly to that.
Ultimately discarded this version because it's too narrow a message for the main stage. Not a lot of traffic for these keywords, etc etc. We still use this messaging but on a dedicated landing page for the product-market fit survey (which is a great survey that everyone should run).
The visuals (in the grey squares) are irrevocably lost but honestly there wasn't much to look at in the first place.

Main idea: focus on YC's mantra — "Make something people want". The first step in making something people want is finding out what is it that people want. We provide a pathway to that.
+ better visuals, more features, better feeling that this is a real product, not a landing page with a waiting list behind it (which was the case for the version above).
Discarded this version because it didn't resonate enough for people to convert.

The main idea: differentiate ourselves from competition by using different language. The other guys™ typically focus on efficiency, managing large volumes of feedback, feedback portals, voting for features etc.
We wanted to focus on the stage before you need all that. The stage when no one wants to give you any feedback, yet. The very humble beginnings of a startup.
It's incredibly difficult to get feedback at that stage. A great way to cut through the indifference is by being very human, very approachable, present, proactive, etc etc.
We wanted our messaging to reflect that.
+ more refined visuals
+ more features
+ integrations
+ usecases
+ lower pricing
And yet, this landing page did not convert.
This messaging still describes really well how we're different but ultimately, it wasn't strong enough.
(there is an artefact on the screenshot: the sticky header didn't stick correctly)

This version sells. For high-quality traffic sources (like indiehackers and similar), it gives us about 10% conversion rate (visitor-to-successful-signup).
For this version, we spoke to a sales strategy consultant, and also a marketing person joined the team. I highly recommend talking to a professional if you're stuck.
Main idea: tie feedback to growth while still maintaining our human approach.
Everybody wants growth. It's also true that feedback leads to dramatic growth. In hindsight, it seems soooo obvious that this is the exactly correct framing.
+ beginning of templates
+ beginning of blog
+ better visuals
+ the whole page is more coherently connected with the messaging
+ everything is way more polished
Is this the best possible landing page? Absolutely not, but it was the difference between 0 and 1 (for us).
It can absolutely be better but it's no longer the bottleneck for the business.

Happy to answer any questions. Also feedback is very welcome.
Don't forget to like this post if you like it 😘
I was searching for insights, and your post arrived at the right time; the way you have iterated is so effective that I could see the messaging change and how it relates at each stage.
A query. Where do Micro SaaS founders prefer to build their landing page if they are at the MVP stage or the 'just launched' stage? Is it Carrd, Notion, or WordPress, or would they prefer to have it custom-made? Are there other preferred platforms?
I am trying to provide a productized landing page service for micro SaaS founders; your feedback would be helpful.
Thank you! I’m using the same stack for landing pages as for the product itself — nextjs. No CMS, all hardcore. Just a bit of MDX with frontmatter for blog as it’s perfect for that.
It’s faster for me to do it this way as I’m very technical rather than to use something like Carrd. Also, I can be certain I can do anything I might need with the highest quality and precision.
Plus, the border between landings and product is blurry (eg a template can be installed/used right from its public page), they share styles and a few components.
Thank you, Ilya. The service I want to give pre-launch and just launched micro saas founders is Positioning and Messaging (I thought ' landing page copy with Carrd support would be the best way to offer it ), or would the founders need some other support? Please do suggest
Oh I think I misunderstood your original question.
If you’re asking what other support micro-saas founders might find useful aside from making a landing page on Carrd (or somewhere) — I can only speculate. I think that would be everything around the actual messaging. Iterating on it, suggesting how to test it, how to know when it’s time to pivot to another idea, etc. A lot of this work has to be done by the founder but guidance and expertise is useful.
Honestly though, that’s just what I think others might want, but I don’t include myself in that cohort. For me, I think it’s important that I do almost all of this work myself because it’s so critical for success.
I may still not understand your question. Feel free to reach out on twitter — @sirnovikov
Btw this is something I see early-stage startups struggle with all the time. Positioning and messaging are just as integral if not more to good design as visual aesthetics.
I like the iterations and how you are taking a measurable approach to the UX design! Best of luck!
❤️
Looks awesome! If you ever need help turning this into a mobile app (I build with Flutter), I’d love to help or brainstorm. I’m always down to collaborate with fellow builders. 🔧
❤️
So cool to see this comparison with real results!
As a potential user, I find the latest version much cleaner and more straightforward—it’s immediately clear what the tool does and how I’d use it.
But honestly, what really won me over was the new 'Free' option. Since it’s a new product, I really want to try it out before committing to a paid plan, and this model makes that possible. Super exciting!
Thanks! Ah yeah I must have missed that version where we did introduce the free option and it wasn’t enough on its own to start converting.
Would love for you to try it out 😊
Fascinating thread. It seems you built this for desktop. Have you considered a mobile first approach? Can you talk about the CR split between desktop and mobile?
Thank you. Actually everything on the website is mobile first, including all internal pages (even the survey builder and survey pages themselves — the most complex ui ever) and all public pages.
Desktop traffic is almost 20x mobile. All conversions are on desktop.
If I reach via your app, would introduce me to your sales consultant?
Of course!
Here's some user feedback: there is no way to contqct anyone on your website! LOL - got a twitter handle?
That’s good feedback :)
@sirnovikov
this is great. welldone
Crazy how so many agencies just build pages their clients are happy with vs using focus groups to provide real insights on how to improve designs so that they convert. This should be apart of every design process.
Good share!
<h1>hello</h1>