I'm building SimpleClause, an AI tool that turns legal jargon (NDAs, leases, contracts) into plain English. Obvious target audience overlap is subreddits like r/legaladvice, r/Tenant, r/freelance. Except most of them either ban self-promotion outright or restrict it to weekly "share your startup" threads that get almost no visibility.
I tried the "be genuinely helpful with zero mention" approach for a while. Answer real questions, build a visible profile over time, hope people click through on their own. It honestly felt like a lot of effort for very little signal.
I'm curious to know, what's actually worked for others in a similar spot. A product that solves a real problem, but whose most obvious communities are hostile to any form of self-promotion. Did you find channels that converted better, or is patience with the slow-burn approach genuinely the answer?
I believe you need to plant the seed. Try to offer something to your ICP for free on your website, and people might actually convert from it.
What's the tool, if you can share? Legal-adjacent tools live or die on trust — a 40s screen-capture of one real document going through it (translation, score, red flags) usually outearns any text post. Happy to point at live examples.
Update, since I offered below: the SimpleClause spec is done — 47 seconds, free, no strings: https://loveoftheai.github.io/demo-videos/ (SimpleClause card, top of page).
One real run on your free demo, recorded live: an NDA indemnification clause pasted word for word, the plain-English translation ("if you share information, you protect the other person from your mistakes — for three years after it ends"), the contract-health score, and the what-to-ask-for-instead bullets. Every frame from simpleclause.me, labelled as a spec.
Post it anywhere you like, it's yours. If you ever want a version with your script and VO — that's the paid tier, but this one's a gift.
I run into this all the time.
What worked for me was flipping the order: instead of promoting, I make the artifact first. I pick a newly launched tool, cut an unsolicited 40-60s demo/spec trailer from its public site in one sitting, and send it to the founder free — no ask attached. ~25 of them now live here: https://loveoftheai.github.io/demo-videos/ — every one landed in a DM-able thread where a cold pitch would have been deleted.
Why it dodges self-promo rules: the first thing you hand over is a finished video of THEIR product. Subreddits that ban "check out my tool" will often still allow a screen-capture video when the video itself is the content. And founders you gift one to will often post it themselves — that's organic distribution you don't control and don't have to.
If you want one for the legal-niche tool, I'll cut it free — one sitting, no strings.
The Reddit restriction is clear, but the bigger question seems to be channel quality. Have any alternative channels produced users who actually use SimpleClause on real documents?
most of what I've tried so far, I can tell you produced signups or traffic, but I haven't broken it down by whether someone actually ran a real document through it vs. poked around once and left. I track usage per account, so this is answerable, I just haven't sliced it by acquisition source yet, which channel's signups convert to an actual simplify-a-real-document event, not just a signup
That acquisition-to-real-use split is the useful thing to uncover. Would email be easier? What’s the best address for you?
I've I've left the email as a placeholder rather than filling it in for you. you'll want to give out whatever address you're comfortable being public on a forum thread (probably not your personal Gmail if that's the one tied to internal testing), maybe a hello@ or founder@ simpleclause.me address if you have one set up, or just create one if not.
left the email as a placeholder rather than filling it in for you. you'll want to give out whatever address you're comfortable being public on a forum thread (probably not your personal Gmail if that's the one tied to internal testing), maybe a hello@ or founder@ simpleclause.me address if you have one set up, or just create one if not.
Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.
Reddit filters have gotten extremely aggressive recently against brand names and store links. What worked best for us was focusing purely on technical writeups and founder stories in the post body without any self-links or app store references, then sharing details in comment replies when people ask. Direct mod approvals also help clear false positives!
For niche tools, building simple free utility tools that users organically recommend works much better on Reddit than direct posting. When other members link to your tool naturally in response to questions, it carries far more credibility and avoids mod flag issues.
The "genuinely helpful with zero mention" approach failing to convert isn't surprising pure lurking builds karma, but karma alone doesn't create purchase intent, it just avoids getting banned. Two things that tend to work better in hostile-to-promo niches: 1) answering in communities adjacent to your target (freelancer-focused Discord servers, legal-tech newsletters, r/smallbusiness style subs with looser rules) rather than the exact niche subs, and 2) becoming the answer people link to themselves if your free tool is genuinely useful, other people citing it in r/legaladvice threads carries more weight than you ever could, and doesn't trip any self-promo rule.
I think the “be helpful and hope people click” approach works better when you treat it as relationship building rather than a direct acquisition channel.
For a product with obvious community overlap, I’d probably separate the two goals: participate normally where self-promotion is restricted, and use channels that explicitly allow product discovery for the actual launch or promotion.
I’ve also found that useful comments can still be valuable even when they produce zero clicks. They help reveal the language people use to describe the problem, which can be useful for improving landing-page copy, content topics, and positioning.
The difficult part is knowing when to stop investing time in a community that simply doesn’t allow the type of promotion your product needs. That’s where I’d measure qualified conversations or product interest rather than just profile views or clicks.
I have created multiple accounts on Reddit and all of them got suspended. Whenever we mention our brand anywhere in the post, Reddit filters automatically removes that. Somehow I managed to grow a reddit account upto 1000 Karma a 50+, but that too got suspended once I mentioned our product name. Strange!!!
Ran the zero-mention version for a couple of months. A low-karma account sorts at the bottom, so an answer on a quiet thread is invisible no matter how good it is — answering inside threads that are already climbing is the only version with a chance. What converted better for us was founder communities like this one, where people actually reply.
I'm also confused how I add my business in different communities of reddit.
Reddit is very strict!
Ran into the exact same wall this week launching a couple of small tools. Reddit blocks the automation I use outright (not even a rate-limit, a hard restriction), so I skipped it entirely instead of fighting it. What actually worked: TabNews (Brazil-focused, but same idea applies — dev/builder communities that allow a genuine "here's what I shipped" post, not disguised as a question) and Indie Hackers' product directory itself, which took zero karma to list a product page even before I could post to the main feed. The karma-gated feed here is annoying short-term but makes sense — it's exactly what keeps it from turning into the Reddit self-promo mess you're describing.
Same thing happened to me this week, a post got removed within a day on a fresh, low-karma account. From what I've read since, it's less about the copy and more about Reddit's Contributor Quality Score flagging new accounts as spam-risk regardless of what you write. The slow burn, weeks of genuine comments, no links, before posting anything promotional, looks like the actual unlock, not just a nice-to-have. Annoying, but at least it means the writing probably wasn't the problem.
Reddit's communities would be nearly perfect concentrations of very specific targeted users for many products. Most of them have ridiculous rules that make them completely worthless. Reddit overall will also shadowban you without ever telling you and won't tell you what you were banned for. Completely worthless. Glad to see people finding other ways to succeed in the face of heavy handed regulation.
Yeah, I ran into this too. Got roasted for posting to r/DiscordAlternatives, and pretty much everywhere else my post got auto-banned.
For legal tech or contract tools, Reddit is too hostile for direct growth early on. Shift your distribution to X (Build in Public) and niche directories. On X, share screenshots of actual insane legal clauses translated into plain English, that visual "before and after" performs insanely well organically because people love sharing weird contracts.
The challenge here is that "obvious audience overlap" is not the same as "audience that will buy." Reddit's hostility to self-promo might actually be filtering out people who aren't ready to convert - they're there to vent, not to solve. Have you measured which channels bring users who actually use the tool past day 1? The ones that show interest in Reddit but convert elsewhere might reveal where your real customers hang out.
I'm actually testing this right now with one of my mobile apps, and I'm starting to think Reddit works better as a trust/discovery channel than as a direct acquisition channel.
I tried posting about my resume app today and ran into exactly this problem — the communities with the best audience fit are also the ones where direct promotion is difficult or simply not welcome.
So I'm changing the approach: instead of posting "here's my app", I'm building useful content around the problems the app solves and only mentioning the product when it's genuinely relevant.
At the same time, I'm testing SEO, dedicated landing pages and communities like Indie Hackers so I'm not dependent on a single channel.
Too early for me to say what converts best, but I'm planning to track the whole experiment and share the actual numbers. My feeling so far is that Reddit probably works much better as one piece of a distribution system than as the distribution system itself.
Good luck with the experiment, sounds like we're converging on the same conclusion from different products: Reddit as one piece of trust/discovery within a wider system, not the acquisition engine on its own. Would be genuinely useful to compare notes once you've got real numbers, since I'm about to run a similar test.
Today, after a couple of days trying to post on Reddit, only my post was removed just the moment I hit that post button. It's amazing to see everyone here build something. It's inspiring- all the headaches building the app; the hardest part is finding the first 10 alpha users, and I nearly gave up. But here you just rekindled the hope that it is all possible, having a community that believes in a common goal. Development, nature, and a breakthrough. Keep pushing, and your day is coming when you hit that million-dollar.
Let's help each other grow and make this platform better than Reddit. Because here we will find help, grow, and be successful, and we should not forget indihackers.
Dikuchi
I’d treat the channel as two jobs: learn the exact questions people ask, and acquire users. Reddit can be excellent for the first even when it’s poor at the second; I’d turn recurring questions into durable explainers on a channel you control, then measure qualified usage rather than clicks. In the communities that permit it, asking mods about an educational AMA before posting seems safer than trying to sneak a product mention into every answer.
This is the same two-jobs split someone else raised earlier in this thread (learn vs. acquire), and hearing it converge from multiple people is making it feel less like one opinion and more like the actual right framing. The "ask mods about an educational AMA" suggestion is a good concrete next step rather than another vague "engage helpfully" idea.
I went through a similar pivot. The key insight for me was that enterprise customers don't buy features — they buy risk reduction. Your pitch needs to be 'here's how we reduce your operational risk' not 'look at our feature list.'
I measured this instead of guessing, and the answer surprised me: for us the self-promo rules were never the binding constraint.
Every text post I made on Reddit was silently spam-filtered. Visible to me while logged in, 404 to everyone else — including on my own profile page. Fifteen posts, 2 total clicks in 21 days. I only found out by opening my own permalinks in a private window. If you haven't done that check, do it before you rewrite anything: if your posts 404 when logged out, the rules were never your problem and no amount of value-first phrasing will fix it.
Comments are a completely different system. Same account, same subs, no filter, they survive. So the rule I follow now is: on Reddit I only comment, never post, and never put a URL in the comment body — a link in a comment is what actually gets them removed. The profile carries the link instead.
Here is the 21-day board, total smartlink clicks by channel:
our own site 406 · SEO 143 · Bluesky 100 · Quora 57 · X 46 · note (JP) 40 · IndieHackers 30 · Medium 25 · Reddit 2.
Two things I had wrong for weeks:
Our own site is more than half of every click we get. Social posts are one-day spikes; the site compounds. I was spending most of my effort on the spiky half.
Ranking channels by total clicks just flatters whichever one you posted to most. Divide by posts and the order inverts — Reddit is 0.47 clicks per post over 15 posts, Bluesky is about 10. Same effort, 20x apart. I now rank by clicks-per-post AND "did it produce anything in the last three days", because a channel that worked a month ago and nothing since is a memory, not a channel.
For what it's worth, the channel that did work from zero followers was Bluesky — chronological feed, no follower gate, links aren't penalized. That is the closest thing to old Reddit reach I have found.
Context in case it is useful: I am building SIGNUM, a free US-market intelligence app — options flow, dark-pool share, max pain, gamma exposure, the desk-side data that runs $50-99/month elsewhere. The "our own site" line above is the app's own web surface, which is why I care so much that it compounds. https://signumhq.com/app?from=indiehackers
I'd stop measuring Reddit by clicks or signups. For a trust purchase like legal docs, the conversion lag is 30 to 90 days. Nobody clicks a stranger's comment, they google your brand when the panic hits and they need a contract read tonight. The metric worth watching is unprompted brand search volume in Search Console six to twelve weeks after an explainer post lands. If that curve moves, the channel is working and every click-based dashboard will tell you it isn't.
Thanks for writing this up. Bookmarking it for later.
One thing I learned building CubistAI (free AI image generator) that maps onto this thread: the "channel mismatch" framing really resonates. I initially spent weeks trying to get traction in AI art subreddits — same problem you're describing. Most ban self-promotion, and the few that allow it have weekly threads where your link gets buried in minutes.
What actually moved the needle was something different: SEO-friendly landing pages for specific use cases. Instead of one generic "AI image generator" page, I built dedicated pages for headshot generation, cartoon conversion, coloring pages, etc. Each one targets a specific search intent — someone looking for "AI headshot generator" is much further along in their buying journey than someone browsing r/aiart.
The results weren't instant, but they're compounding. Six months later those pages are still bringing in traffic every day. A Reddit post has a 48-hour shelf life. An evergreen page keeps working.
That said, I'm still figuring out the community piece. Would be curious if anyone here has found a way to make communities work without the self-promo friction, or if the real answer is just "SEO + product quality and let the communities be a bonus rather than a primary channel."
One more angle worth adding: your niche is unusually good for AI search visibility, which works differently from Reddit. Questions like "what does this indemnification clause mean" are exactly the definition-style queries AI answer engines love, and they overwhelmingly cite clear, structured explainer pages. If each clause gets its own page with a plain-English definition, a short example, and FAQ schema — plus a llms.txt pointing crawlers at the library — you become the citable source when Perplexity or ChatGPT answers that question. And here's the kicker: Reddit is one of the most-cited domains in AI answers, so those zero-mention helpful comments you already wrote can keep working for you long after the thread dies. The win isn't beating Reddit's rules — it's making the answers themselves the distribution.
This is very useful about AI answer engines, you're right this is exactly the kind of definitional query those engines are built to answer, well-defined pages are exactly what gets cited. The llms.txt suggestion is new to me too, I'll look into that.
Yeah, Reddit really isn't friendly to new users. I had about 10 posts get deleted almost instantly.
Really good insights here. I think focusing on genuinely helpful content first and diversifying beyond Reddit can make a big difference.
I would think a website with SEO, a video channel or mini tools (like cost calculators) would be a better time investment. Learn/scrape from reddit the terms people are looking for and cover them all in the content you create. After you have your content library you could then make comments saying "I have a resource exactly for that" which would be more indirect way to market.
That sounds like a strong strategy, especially for someone who’s still building credibility on Reddit. I’d take a similar approach: instead of relying entirely on Reddit’s rules and visibility, build assets you control (e.g., SEO-focused website, educational content, or useful tools) and then reference those resources when relevant questions come up.
I’d also explore other platforms and forums where the target audience already gathers. Reddit can be useful for learning which problems people care about, but it doesn’t have to be your only distribution channel.
The "indirect marketing via comments" idea is a nice twist I hadn't landed on. Instead of ever posting the product, build the content library first, then when someone asks the exact question you've already written about, you can genuinely say "I've got something on this" without it reading as a pitch, because you're pointing at content, not a landing page. That's a much softer entry point than anything I'd been planning. Mini-tools like cost/clause calculators are also a good addition to the list. something interactive is more shareable than a static page, and it's still not "the product" in the strict sense.
Numbers from an account that got this wrong expensively, because they answer your question better than an opinion would.
Twenty five posts. Ten moderator removals. Then a site-wide sweep that ended the account. The cause was not the self-promo rules, it was cadence: two runs made three posts in a single day, and that was that.
The more useful number is the other one. ONE post produced roughly 88 percent of all the karma that account ever earned. Sixty one points on r/ollama, from a title that named a specific technical confusion and answered it in the title itself. Every founder-journey or product post, seven of them, scored a combined five.
They were not punished for being promotional. They were ignored for being about us.
So what worked was not a workaround for the rules. It was writing the post the subreddit would have upvoted with the link removed, then leaving one closing line pointing somewhere useful. If that closing line would not help a reader who never buys anything, it belongs in a reply rather than in the post.
For your niche the explainer shape is sitting right there. "The three clauses people miss in a residential lease, and how to spot each one" is a post r/Tenant carries on its own merits, and it runs on the same expertise your product does. The self-promo rule cannot touch it because there is nothing in it to promote.
The question worth carrying into any new venue: is reach here gated by MY follower count, or by the venue's own ranking? Follower-gated means ride someone else's thread, because your own posts reach nobody. Community-ranked, which is Reddit and this place, means post, because a zero-follower account gets served like anyone else.
One honest caveat on the patience question you asked: the zero-mention helpful approach did not work for us either, but our sample was a few weeks on a young account, which is the exact condition where nothing works. That is not evidence it fails at twelve months.
If you want the channel side measured rather than guessed, contentmation.com/score does a free read of a domain with no login. It will not tell you which subreddit will tolerate you, that part stays judgment.
That’s a very insightful observation regarding the classification of social media—distinguishing between follower count and the platform's own mechanisms for reaching users. It closely mirrors my own current situation, yet I hadn't thought to categorize social media in that way. I’ve learned something new; thanks for sharing.
This is exactly the kind of data I was hoping someone would show up with. Thank you for actually breaking down what got removed vs. what worked instead of just "post helpfully."
The 88% number is the one that lands hardest. It matches what I've been circling around too: I'd already noticed that on r/legaladvice and r/Tenant, anything with even a soft product mention gets nuked regardless of how helpful the surrounding content is. whereas r/TenantHelp is looser and only bans outright spam. But your framing reframes what "helpful" should mean there. I've been writing replies to existing threads, which caps reach at whoever's already reading that thread. A standalone explainer post like "the three clauses people miss in a residential lease" is a completely different animal.
That distinction you drew Follower-gated vs. community-ranked, is genuinely a very useful take. Appreciate the caveat on the zero-mention approach too. Also good to know a few weeks on a young account isn't a fair test either way. Really appreciate your insight
Really solid approach — curious how you're thinking about this, what's been the hardest part to figure out so far?
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
Thanks for sharing the numbers, that makes it much easier to follow.
For the "answer within hours" part, F5Bot (https://f5bot.com) is a free keyword alert for Reddit posts and comments, with subreddit filters. Set it to phrases lifted straight from documents, like "indemnification clause", "normal wear and tear" or "non-compete", and you get an email within minutes of each new thread, including small subs outside your usual rotation.
Hmm still
I’m running into a similar issue with a browser extension, although the communities are obviously different.
I think the biggest lesson is that “don’t self-promote” and “be helpful” aren't necessarily the same strategy. If you only comment without ever giving people a reason to connect with what you're building, it can become a lot of work with very little measurable signal.
I’m starting to lean toward finding communities and channels where product discovery is actually expected, while using problem-focused discussions elsewhere purely to learn and participate.
The other thing I’m wondering is whether the slow-burn approach is actually better for trust but just harder to measure. A person who discovers your product through a genuine discussion may be much more valuable than someone who clicks a promotional post once.
I had the same issue with Reddit today. One subreddit filtered my post, while another accepted it.
I’m starting to think problem-specific content is a better strategy than direct product posts. Have you seen better long-term results from search-driven content?
Ran this exact experiment for the last month, so here are real numbers instead of a vibe.
From one Reddit account: nine posts across r/SideProject, r/indiehackers, r/founder, r/startupideas, r/betatests and r/TestMyApp. Every one silently filtered. They look completely normal when you are logged in, which is the trap. Check by loading /r/{sub}/new in a logged out window, never by looking at your own profile. One other post got removed by a mod with an actual reason, which is a different thing and fixable.
Same account, same month, around 35 comments. Every single one live. Zero removed.
So the rule is not that Reddit is hostile to promotion. The rule is that posts are gated and comments are not. That changes what you do in r/legaladvice and r/Tenant. Stop trying to post. Answer the lease and NDA questions with the actual answer, no link, no mention of SimpleClause at all.
The difference from the "be helpful" phase you already tried is where the effort goes. Pick threads where you can do the work inside the comment. Someone posts a confusing indemnity clause, you paste the plain English rewrite right there in the reply. You are not describing what your tool does, you are doing what your tool does, for free, in public. People ask what you used. That question is the conversion event, and it comes from them, so no rule is broken.
The other thing I did not expect: my best performing comments are the ones where I opened somebody's product, used it until something broke, and led with the bug. Specific beats helpful by a lot.
"You're not describing what your tool does, you are doing what your tool does, for free, in public". That's a completely different move than posting a helpful comment. it's giving someone the actual output for their specific clause, right there, which makes "what did you use for that" a natural question instead of something you're angling for. Going to try this directly: find real confused-clause threads and just paste the plain-English rewrite in the reply.
Reddit cracking down on self-promo is such a common wall to hit. What ended up working instead — did you find a channel that actually converts for a legal-niche tool, or was it more about changing how you show up on Reddit itself?
I think the biggest shift is treating Reddit as a source of customer research rather than only a distribution channel. The exact questions and wording people use in these threads can tell you what content, tools, or landing pages to build elsewhere.
If the same problem keeps coming up, that’s probably a stronger signal than trying to force a product mention into the conversation. Reddit can start the discovery process even if the actual conversion happens through search, content, or another channel.
Really relatable. How much time do you put into this each week?
The slow-burn helpful-commenter route does work in legal-adjacent spaces, but you're aiming it at the wrong side of the transaction. The people asking "what does this clause mean" on r/Tenant and r/legaladvice are mostly not buyers — they're anxious tenants and freelancers who will use a free tool once and never pay. The people who draft the documents — landlords, property managers, small agencies, freelance clients — have recurring pain and budgets. r/Landlord and BiggerPockets forums are far more tolerant of tools than r/legaladvice is, and those readers actually sign contracts repeatedly. Two channels I'd test before anything else: 1. Search, not social. Queries like "what does [specific clause] mean in a lease" are high-intent and the competition is thin, boring legal blogs. One genuinely good explainer per clause type compounds in a way Reddit comments never will. 2. Clause teardowns as content. Take a real (anonymized) lease or NDA, walk through the three clauses that actually matter, and show the before/after. That format travels — newsletters for freelancers and property managers will run it. The honest reframe: Reddit isn't your channel problem. Free users asking one-off questions might be your customer problem. Sell to the people who produce the jargon, not just the people confused by it.
I'm now fairly convinced I need to check this. The bug-first framing on your best comments ("led with the bug" rather than "here's what my tool does") is a sharp addition, specificity over general helpfulness. That's a subtly different instruction than "be helpful,"
Good point. Did you test that with users before committing to it?
Really relatable. How much time do you put into this each week?
I've had better luck treating those communities as places to learn the language of the problem rather than as acquisition channels. I keep a small log of recurring questions, then turn the patterns into genuinely useful answers and measure whether the conversations lead to repeat readers over time. Have you tried partnering with moderators on a resource or office-hours thread that they explicitly approve?
Clear and practical, thanks. Did anything surprise you along the way?
Maybe try forums not-reddit but within your niche. For example, I tried to sell AMC 10 mock tests but my posts got banned on Reddit, but I received decent traffic from Art Of Problem Solving forums which is where math-contest enthusiasts chat and want resources.
Lived this exact thing this week. Posted the same link across a few dropshipping subreddits within a couple hours and all three got silently removed — not even a rule violation notice, just gone. Switched to genuine no-link comments on relevant threads instead and that's actually been more effective than any of the promotional posts. Slower, but it doesn't get nuked.
One channel that rarely gets mentioned here: the Reddit threads that are already ranking in Google. Search site:reddit.com plus the exact clause questions your buyers type, and you'll find two- and three-year-old r/Tenant and r/legaladvice threads sitting on page one for them. Mods aren't policing those anymore, and a thorough answer left as a comment compounds quietly for years instead of dying in the 12-hour window a new post gets. It's the same "be helpful with zero mention" motion you already tried, except pointed at pages with persistent search demand rather than at a feed, which is probably why the first attempt felt like effort with no signal. Worth pairing that with a direct message to the r/Tenant mods asking whether a free, no-signup version would be allowed for their members, or whether they'd host a flaired AMA; smaller subs say yes far more often than people assume when you approach them before posting rather than after a removal. One question though: since legal is a trust purchase, have you tested whether the resistance you're hitting is actually about self-promotion, or about AI touching legal documents at all? Those two have completely different fixes, and no channel change solves the second one.
This is a concrete data point, and it might reframe everything. I genuinely haven't checked whether my own Reddit posts are visible to logged-out users or just to me — going to go verify that before changing anything else. Your clicks-per-post framing (vs raw totals) is also a much better way to compare channels than what I'd been doing. And the "comment-only, link-in-profile-not-comment-body" rule is specific enough to actually implement rather than vague "be helpful" advice. Appreciate the real numbers, that's rare to get in a thread like this.
Really relatable. How much time do you put into this each week?
“Thanks for sharing the actual experience. What would you do differently if you were starting again today?”
Running the same grind right now for my own product, a few weeks in. What I'd tell myself at day one: the big obvious subs are the worst place to start - heavy moderation, zero tolerance, users trained to ignore. The signal is in smaller adjacent subs where the same problem shows up casually, plus Reddit search itself: the exact complaint phrase ("what does this clause mean"), answered within hours of being asked, beats any weekly promo thread because the asker's guard is down. And yes, the account needs a karma runway first - figure two or three weeks of pure helpful answers with zero mentions before any link survives. It is slow, but each good answer keeps working in search results for years, which no other channel gives you. What made you pick Reddit as the primary channel for this - is your audience actually there, or just the problem?
The follower-gated versus community-ranked question is the most useful filter for channel decisions I have seen. Most people pick platforms by where their audience lives, not by whether their own account reach actually matters. That one distinction would save a lot of wasted months.
For legal niche, the explainer shape is sitting right there. r/Tenant upvotes detailed breakdowns because most answers in that sub are short and vague. A post that walks through three actual lease clauses with the real contract language earns its own distribution. No product mention needed, and the credibility transfers anyway.
I found the same thing building Genie. Posts that drove real interest were the ones where someone could take something concrete away without clicking through. Once I stopped writing about the product and started writing from the knowledge the product is built on, the organic engagement changed.
Have you tested any long-form explainer posts on r/Tenant yet, to see how they perform when there is no link at all?
How did you decide this was worth building in the first place?
Reddit was never going to be the channel for this. Legal jargon translation is a trust purchase, and trust purchases travel through whoever already advises the buyer: small-firm attorneys, paralegals, and property managers who get asked these questions for free and hate it. I would go find fifty of them on LinkedIn, hand them a free white-labeled version, and let their clients become your distribution.
Interesting. How are you measuring whether it is working?
does user started checking your user profile?
Interesting. How are you measuring whether it is working?
The channel-separation point matches my experience closely, just from the consumer side instead of legal. I've been commenting genuinely — no product mention, ever — in a subreddit for adults navigating aging/dying parents. Real threads, real answers, nothing promotional. It's been useful for exactly one thing: learning the actual language people use for the problem. Nobody says "digital estate planning" — they say things closer to "I don't even know what accounts my dad has." It has driven approximately zero direct traffic. The content built around what I heard in those threads is where the real signal shows up. Reddit taught me what to write; it didn't do the writing's job for me.
you are write
The problem you encountered on Reddit can only be alleviated but not completely resolved by any method. Have you considered seeking help in other communities or forums?
Helpful post. How did you get your first bit of traction?
I’ve run into a similar issue. When the community is strict about self-promotion, trying to force a product mention usually hurts more than it helps. What seems more sustainable is building distribution outside those communities—SEO, niche forums that allow tools, partnerships, and content that answers the exact problem people are already searching for. Then use Reddit mainly to build credibility and learn from real users rather than treating every discussion as a traffic opportunity. The slow-burn approach can work, but I’d diversify the channels instead of relying on Reddit alone.
Diversifying instead of relying on Reddit alone is probably the single clearest theme across this whole thread now. Multiple people landed here independently. "Reddit for credibility and learning, not traffic" is a good way to frame what its actual job should be for me going forward.
One tension worth naming in the "write once, publish twice" plan: a page built to rank in Google and a post built to get upvoted on r/Tenant aren't quite the same piece of writing. Search rewards structure and the exact phrasing people type; Reddit rewards something that reads like a person who actually knows the answer, not an SEO page. Which one are you optimizing the first draft for — because retrofitting a Reddit post into an SEO page (or vice versa) usually costs you real engagement on whichever one comes second.
A genuinely sharp point and I don't think I'd separated it clearly enough. that "write once, publish twice" assumes the same draft serves both goals, but a page built for search needs to match exact phrasing and structure while a Reddit post needs to read like a person, in the room, who actually knows the answer. Yes those are different registers, not just different formats. I think the honest answer is: write for Reddit first, since a bad SEO page just ranks poorly and quietly fails, but a Reddit post that reads like content marketing gets removed and can hurt the account. Then adapt it for the site afterward rather than trying to serve both audiences with the first draft.
"Write for Reddit first because failure is quiet on one side and costly on the other" is a better rule than anything I'd have suggested — asymmetric downside is the right thing to sequence around, not just which one feels more important. Good luck with the legal-niche stuff, that's a tricky community to earn trust in.
Good
ran into this exact wall this week trying to post about a new thing I'm building. brand new account, tried r/Entrepreneur, r/smallbusiness, r/startups - blocked from posting on all three, some for karma/age, one auto-flagged my post for having any link or pitch in it at all even after I stripped it down. what's actually working so far is just... not posting about the product at all. answering questions in threads where I actually know something, no link, no "check out my thing" at the end. slower than I'd like but at least it's not getting nuked
This tracks with pretty much everyone else's experience in this thread The "answer questions, no link approach you've landed on is the same thing several people here converged on independently. Curious how long you've been at it — is it actually moving any needle yet, or still too early to tell?
I have a problem posting my build on Reddit to begin with. Whatever I do, and however strictly I follow the guidelines, it always gets removed. Any suggestions?
Is there any link or mention of your product in the post itself, even indirect? A few people in this thread made the same point from different angles: it's not really about how "strictly" you follow the written rules, it's whether the post reads as being about you at all. A test... one commenter to my question used was a filter [would this post earn upvotes with the link removed entirely?] If the post only makes sense as a pitch, mods or auto-mod will likely catch it regardless of how carefully it's worded. Cadence matters - Someone in this thread lost an entire account to a site-wide ban, and the actual trigger wasn't a rules violation on any single post. it was posting multiple times in a single day, which trips spam detection regardless of content. If you're posting frequently across subs, spacing it out (and maybe checking your account's post history for that pattern) is worth ruling out first. Check whether the specific subreddit explicitly bans self-promotion vs. just "spam." These aren't the same thing, and it varies a lot sub to sub
This helps, thanks. Diagnosing myself against it: my posts had the link and were about the product, and I posted two of them on consecutive days from a young account. Sitewide filter both times, not the subs. The "would it earn upvotes with the link removed" test is the one I'll use going forward. Rebuilding with comments, one post a week max, no links until the account has standing.
Helpful post. How did you get your first bit of traction?
Thanks! Honestly, my first real traction came from a ProductHunt launch back in July. That gave the first meaningful wave of signups in a single day rather than the slow trickle I'd gotten before. Since then it's been trying to find channels that don't fight me the way Reddit's self-promo rules do. If I'm honest, distribution has been the harder problem than building the product itself, which is basically what this whole thread has been helping me rethink.
I’d probably separate “where the problem is discussed” from “where you acquire the customer.”
Reddit can still be useful for learning the exact language people use around contracts, leases, and NDAs, even if direct promotion isn’t allowed.
Then I’d take the highest-intent problems from those conversations and test channels where you can actually target that intent — search, targeted content, or paid search.
The key metric wouldn’t be traffic from Reddit. It would be whether those problem signals can consistently turn into qualified visits, product usage, and eventually paid users elsewhere.
This is a really useful split. I'd been treating Reddit as a single channel with one job (get users), when really it sounds like it's better split into two jobs: mining the actual language people use vs. acquiring people directly (which Reddit itself is structurally bad at, self-promo rules aside). The metric point lands too.
I'd stop fighting Reddit. The people who need your tool are the ones asking friends what a clause means, so go where they ask. Tenant groups, freelancer groups, a mate who's a property manager. One helpful answer with no link in it has done more for me than any post.
Appreciate you sharing what's actually worked, not just theory. "Go where people are already asking a friend" is a good way to think about it. Reddit tenant/freelancer subs are that, just structured as a public forum instead of a group chat. But the "no link, one-genuinely helpful answer" discipline is the part I keep landing on as non-negotiable
Yeah, that's the bit. The moment there's a link in it, it reads as a pitch and it's dead. Took me a while to accept the answer is the marketing. Good luck with it.
Your product may not have a community problem so much as a channel mismatch. Somebody staring at a clause they do not understand does not post about it and wait for replies, they paste the sentence into a search box that minute. Those searches are long, specific and almost nobody writes for them, because the phrasing comes straight out of the document: what a mutual indemnification clause actually means, whether a landlord can charge for normal wear and tear. One page per clause type, in the plain English your tool already produces, puts you at the exact moment of confusion with no moderator in between. Slower than a good thread, but it does not decay the same way.
"channel mismatch, not a community problem" reframes this better than I had it. You're right that nobody experiencing legal-document confusion is going to post and wait for replies — by the time they're confused enough to ask, they're already typing the actual sentence from the document into a search bar. That's a completely different moment than a Reddit thread. It also means the Reddit content and the "one page per clause type" content aren't competing strategies, they're doing different jobs: Reddit posts catch people mid-conversation in a community; standalone pages catch people at the literal second of confusion, no thread or moderator required.
Putting these together with what came before: it sounds like the actual plan isn't "post more on Reddit" so much as "write the same handful of clause-specific explainers once, then publish them in two places" — as a standalone post where a subreddit allows it, and as an evergreen page on my own site for search. Same content, two different distribution mechanics, neither one dependent on follower count or algorithm mood.
The one useful post out of 25 is the signal I’d trust. I’d build a small library of answers around recurring legal questions and let the profile be the only context about the tool. Track saves, replies, and requests for a follow-up, not clicks. If moderators allow it, a monthly post about what you learned from answering real questions should fit better than a product mention. Have you noticed whether question-specific explainers get more durable search traffic than generic startup threads?
To your question directly: yes, and it's not close. The one post that worked (from the previous reply in this thread) was a specific technical confusion answered in the title. That's not really a "Reddit thread" succeeding, that's a search query getting answered It just happened to live on Reddit. Generic startup/founder threads have a shelf life of maybe 48 hours before they scroll off and stop existing. A question-specific explainer keeps getting found by search (on Reddit or Google) for as long as people keep typing that exact confusion into a search box. Completely agree on the metric shift too, clicks were never the right thing to track here, saves/replies/follow-up-requests are a much better signal of "this actually helped someone," which is really what determines whether it keeps getting surfaced.
This comment was deleted a day ago