Roadmark — public product roadmaps for solo founders & small teams
UPDATE (Jul 27, 2026): out of beta — Roadmark is live and paid plans are open.
Pro $15/mo ($150/yr), Team $49/mo ($490/yr), excl. VAT/sales tax. New accounts still get a 14-day Pro trial with no card. Original post below.
I got tired of roadmaps living in a private Jira board nobody outside the team ever sees. So I'm building Roadmark: you import your milestones (GitHub/Jira/Notion/Monday .com & more), then share a clean, public roadmap board that actually looks good.
A few things that make it different:
- Branch your timeline — spin off "what-if" versions of a plan to pressure-test dates before you commit.
- Public sharing done right — optional password + expiry on shared links, and a white-label option.
- Built-in signals — milestone confidence + slip history, so the roadmap stays honest instead of aspirational.
It's a true micro-SaaS: just me, bootstrapped, on a serverless stack. Free to start.
Live demo board: https://yourroadmark.com/board/roadmark-demo
The milestone confidence and slip history stood out to me.
Most roadmap tools optimize for presenting certainty. You're making uncertainty visible instead. If customers start seeing Roadmark as a tool for building trust with users and stakeholders—not just organizing work—that's a much more distinctive position than being another public roadmap.
Hi, Aryan! You said it better than my landing page — thanks. That's the whole bet: tools that sell certainty train people to distrust the roadmap. So Roadmark leans into honesty — confidence, slip history, and a just-shipped public "Decision Feed" for the why behind every change. Curious from where you sit: would a team actively buy "trust with stakeholders," or is that value only felt after a plan slips?
That's a great question, but I don't think whether teams buy trust before or after a roadmap slips is actually the interesting decision.
Your reply made me think there's a bigger strategic decision sitting underneath that question, and it becomes much more significant as Roadmark grows. I don't think I can explain the reasoning properly in a thread without oversimplifying it.
If you're interested, what's the best email to reach you on?
Appreciate it, and the framing earlier was genuinely sharp. Keeping my focus on building for now rather than opening a big strategic thread — but thanks for taking the time.
Totally fair.
I appreciate the thoughtful discussion either way. Best of luck with Roadmark—I'll be interested to see how it evolves.
Small update on this one: Roadmark is out of beta, and paid plans went live today.
Pro is $15/mo ($150/yr), Team $49/mo ($490/yr) — tax added at checkout. Every new account still starts on a 14-day Pro trial with no card, and upgrading mid-trial keeps the days you have left instead of restarting them.
Free tier stays: 3 roadmaps, unlimited milestones and branches, decision log, imports from GitHub/Linear/Jira/Notion, public sharing. Paid is for people who need more boards, collaborators, investor updates, and protected links.
Small poll while this is up: when a roadmap date slips, where does the "reason" end up for you?
I keep landing on 2 and 4. Curious where everyone else sits.