Do you use any tools for evaluating your coding in regards to security? Like in for secure design, static analysis, any vulnerability scanners? Have you ever had a major security incident?
Security is often treated as a checklist, but in real engineering workflows the hard part is turning security principles into observable signals that reliably indicate risk or exposure. For example, authentication flows aren’t secure until you see automated test failures on token expiry paths, and dependency scanning isn’t useful until you correlate vulnerable version alerts with actual reachable code paths.
In your experience, which metric or behavior do you treat as the earliest reliable signal that a security improvement actually moved the needle in a project (e.g., reduction in high-severity findings in automated scans, fewer auth edge case failures in integration tests, successful endpoint fuzz coverage)? That’s usually what developers look at when deciding what security work to prioritize next.