Selling my production AI-SaaS + MCP server: pSEO Engine — $75K, fast-close $50K by Oct 5
Built this over the past year as a solo founder: a programmatic-SEO factory — AI research → generation → human review → publish (hosted / static ZIP / WordPress) → AEO/GEO audits → GSC + SERP + GA4 rank tracking. It's in production at pseo.quantumcx.net, and it sells twice through one pipeline: humans via Stripe subscriptions (BYOK — customers bring their own AI keys, near-zero marginal cost), and AI agents via the official MCP Registry (net.quantumcx/pseo-engine, also on Glama) with prepaid per-key balances and per-tool pricing. One of the first SEO tools listed there; a distribution channel almost no competitor has.
Fresh-clone verified 2026-09-24: 292/292 tests, 0 type errors, 0 lint warnings, 0 dead code — every diligence claim ships with a reproduction command. ~44,300 lines of strict TypeScript, 84 route handlers, 33 Prisma models. White-label multi-domain from one deployment. Revenue machinery pre-built: subscriptions, agent packs, affiliate program on Stripe Connect, lead scoring, lifecycle email.
I've decided to hand it to an operator with more distribution than I have — optimizing for a fast, clean close (Oct 5), not maximum price. Plainly: pre-revenue. The metrics collector ships in the repo and prints verified numbers when run against production.
Structure: asset sale, 100% upfront via Escrow.com, 72h inspection, transfer executed in parallel, 30 days founder support (~10 hrs/week). Asking $75K; accepting $50K for a close by Oct 5 — that price expires Oct 1 (IST) and reverts to $75K.
If you're serious, DM me one line: "If we agree terms this week, can you wire funds into escrow by Oct 3?" — I'm prioritizing buyers who can answer yes.
What evidence, beyond the technical completeness, convinced you the asset is worth $50K to a buyer despite having no revenue yet?
Fair challenge — I'll concede the premise first: pre-revenue is real, and the price already knows it. $50K is the discounted fast-close number, not the ask.
What makes it worth that to an operator with distribution:
The buyer math: agencies sell this exact output at $5–30K/month per client, so it doesn't take much volume to clear $50K. And the technical completeness is what removes the "hidden rot" discount — every diligence claim ships with a reproduction command, so a buyer verifies instead of trusting me. Curious is free; serious gets a live walkthrough.
The buyer-side evidence is the part I’d want to understand better. Could be useful to compare notes over email sometime, if you’re open to it.
Correction to my own reply — IH doesn't actually have DMs (I've had X on the
brain all week). Email is the way: Baibhab.official@quantumcx.net
The fuller buyer-side answer is in my reply above — reproduction commands,
third-party monitoring, and the escrow structure that takes trust out of the
deal. Happy to go deeper over email.
Thanks! I’ve just sent it over.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts whenever you have a chance.
Open to it — just sent you a DM.
Solid lesson. Which channel has worked best for you so far?
Honest answer: no channel has produced real revenue yet — that's stated plainly in the post, and it's exactly the gap I'm handing to a buyer with distribution. What's worked best so far, ranked:
The reframe for whoever buys: agencies sell this output at $5–30K/month per client. The machinery already exists, so the buyer's real job is picking a channel and pointing traffic at it. Public terms for anyone reading: $75K ask, $50K fast-close by Oct 5, and that price expires Oct 1. Curious is free; serious gets a live walkthrough.