1
0 Comments

Should I open a small invite-only test for international users this early?

I launched Postessia in India less than a week ago.

And the timing is slightly chaotic because I’m also in the middle of my university exams until July 11, so I haven’t really had the time to push the product properly yet.

But something has been on my mind.

Postessia is built around a pretty universal problem with AI-generated LinkedIn content:

Most tools can generate a decent post.

But after a while, the writing starts drifting into the same generic AI patterns and stops sounding like the actual person.

Postessia tries to solve that by learning from multiple writing samples and analyzing patterns across voice, tone, structure, formatting, vocabulary, and other writing habits before generating content.

Right now, the product is still very early.

Less than a week since launch in India.

So I’m wondering if going fully global next would actually be the wrong move.

Instead, after my exams finish on July 11, I’m considering opening a very small invite-only testing round for people outside India who actively post on LinkedIn.

Maybe just 10–20 users initially.

Not a big Product Hunt launch.

Not a “we’re going global” announcement.

Just a controlled test to see how the product behaves with different writing styles, native English speakers, founders from different markets, and people who already have a distinct voice online.

Part of me thinks this would help me catch problems early.

Another part thinks I may be overcomplicating something that should simply be opened publicly.

If you were building this, what would you do?

A) Run a small invite-only international test first

B) Open it globally and learn from whoever signs up.

Also, if you’re outside India and actively write on LinkedIn, would you be interested in testing it after July 11?

on July 6, 2026