As indie hackers, we like to build. It’s how most of us got here.
We see a manual process or a repetitive task and think, “I could knock out a tool for that in a weekend.”
Especially now with AI — the barrier is lower than ever. A couple GPT API calls and suddenly you’ve built something useful.
But just because you can build it doesn’t mean you should.
Here’s a simple decision framework to figure out whether you should build your own AI tool or pay for one.
Start here. Everything else depends on this. “If we build this, does it give us a real, hard-to-copy edge?”
This one question eliminates most distractions. A lot of founders waste months building tools that look impressive but don’t actually move the needle.
If you passed Step 1, ask: “Will customers see, use, or rely on this tool directly?”
Ask yourself: "Does this tool rely on our unique data, workflows, or insights?"
This is where most “we should build it” ideas hit a wall. If it’s just another generic feature, let it go.
Next, ask: “Is there an existing tool that does most of what we need?"
Speed usually matters more than control. Don’t waste cycles rebuilding what already works.
Before you commit, be honest with yourself: “Do we have the time, people, and systems to maintain this tool long-term?”
A lot of founders underestimate the hidden cost of maintenance. Don’t let a side project quietly turn into a full-time burden.
If you’re thinking about building, start small. Create a simple version of the tool to test if it works in your environment, fits your workflows, and actually solves the problem.
A quick prototype helps you spot hidden challenges early — before you commit weeks or months to a full build.
If you’re still pre-PMF or iterating weekly, optimize for speed, not control.
Monte Carlo’s CEO, Lior, learned this the hard way. Here’s what he shared on an episode of our AI Agent Podcast:
"We tried to build everything ourselves -- and it slowed us down. Now we focus only on the parts we're uniquely positioned to build."
When in doubt, buy it. Speed is of the essence.
This is one of the most critical strategic decisions a founder will make in 2024/2025. The "build vs. buy" question for AI tools has a hidden third option: "Assemble."
Here’s a simple framework I use:
· Is the unique data it uses or the specific way it processes information the reason you will win in the market? If yes, you must build it. This is your secret sauce.
· Example: A hyper-personalized recommendation engine for a niche market where your proprietary user data is the key input.
· Are you just adding a common AI feature (e.g., generic text summarization, standard sentiment analysis, basic image generation)? Then paying for an API or a SaaS tool is almost always cheaper and faster.
· Example: Using OpenAI's API to add a "summarize this article" feature to your app. Don't waste cycles building your own model.
· This is the most overlooked option. Use no-code/low-code platforms (like n8n, Make, or even custom GPTs) to assemble existing AI APIs and services into a powerful internal tool.
· Example: Building a "Marketing Content Qualifier" that uses the OpenAI API to analyze a draft, checks it for SEO keywords via another API, and then logs the result to a Google Sheet—all automated in n8n.
· Why assemble? You get 80% of the custom functionality for 10% of the development cost and time. It's the ultimate lean approach for internal tools.
The Final Question: Before you write a single line of code, ask: "Will this AI tool directly generate revenue or save me a minimum of 40+ engineering hours per month?" If the answer is no,the decision is almost always to buy or assemble.
Great post for sparking this essential discussion.
Hi springboard,
Sounds frustrating—I've hit that shift visibility snag in FSM before; turns out, the Workforce Optimization plugin is usually the key (peek under System Definition > Plugins). If it's active, try flipping the "Show Availability" toggle in calendar prefs or double-check the cmn_schedule "Active" flags on user records. Quick config tweak fixed it for us. Fingers crossed—let us know how it goes!
Question 4 is always the toughest, I think. But part of the necessary legwork. Thanks again