9
3 Comments

Should you build that internal ai tool — or just pay for it?

As indie hackers, we like to build. It’s how most of us got here.

We see a manual process or a repetitive task and think, “I could knock out a tool for that in a weekend.”

Especially now with AI — the barrier is lower than ever. A couple GPT API calls and suddenly you’ve built something useful.

But just because you can build it doesn’t mean you should.

Here’s a simple decision framework to figure out whether you should build your own AI tool or pay for one.

Question 1 — Will building give you an unfair advantage?

Start here. Everything else depends on this. “If we build this, does it give us a real, hard-to-copy edge?”

  • If yes, keep going.
  • If no, stop here. Buy something off the shelf and move on.

This one question eliminates most distractions. A lot of founders waste months building tools that look impressive but don’t actually move the needle.

Question 2 — Is this part of your customer journey?

If you passed Step 1, ask: “Will customers see, use, or rely on this tool directly?”

  • If yes, building might make sense — controlling the customer experience can give you an edge.
  • If no, buy something off the shelf unless there’s something uniquely yours about the process.

Question 3 — Do you have a unique context?

Ask yourself: "Does this tool rely on our unique data, workflows, or insights?"

  • If yes, build it. Your unique data or workflows give you an advantage no one else has.
  • If no, buy it. No point reinventing what’s already out there.

This is where most “we should build it” ideas hit a wall. If it’s just another generic feature, let it go.

Question 4 — Is “good enough” already out there?

Next, ask: “Is there an existing tool that does most of what we need?"

  • If yes, buy it. If a SaaS tool covers 80% of your needs, grab it and save your energy.
  • If no, keep going to Step 5.

Speed usually matters more than control. Don’t waste cycles rebuilding what already works.

Question 5 — Can you actually maintain this?

Before you commit, be honest with yourself: “Do we have the time, people, and systems to maintain this tool long-term?”

  • If yes, build it.
  • If no, buy it and keep moving fast.

A lot of founders underestimate the hidden cost of maintenance. Don’t let a side project quietly turn into a full-time burden.

Bonus tips to save yourself headaches

Prototype before you commit

If you’re thinking about building, start small. Create a simple version of the tool to test if it works in your environment, fits your workflows, and actually solves the problem.

A quick prototype helps you spot hidden challenges early — before you commit weeks or months to a full build.

Don’t over-engineer early

If you’re still pre-PMF or iterating weekly, optimize for speed, not control.

Monte Carlo’s CEO, Lior, learned this the hard way. Here’s what he shared on an episode of our AI Agent Podcast:

"We tried to build everything ourselves -- and it slowed us down. Now we focus only on the parts we're uniquely positioned to build."

When in doubt, buy it. Speed is of the essence.

on October 29, 2025
  1. 1

    This is one of the most critical strategic decisions a founder will make in 2024/2025. The "build vs. buy" question for AI tools has a hidden third option: "Assemble."

    Here’s a simple framework I use:

    1. Build ONLY if the AI tool IS your core defensible moat.

    · Is the unique data it uses or the specific way it processes information the reason you will win in the market? If yes, you must build it. This is your secret sauce.
    · Example: A hyper-personalized recommendation engine for a niche market where your proprietary user data is the key input.

    1. Buy (or use a paid API) if it's a standardized, non-differentiating task.

    · Are you just adding a common AI feature (e.g., generic text summarization, standard sentiment analysis, basic image generation)? Then paying for an API or a SaaS tool is almost always cheaper and faster.
    · Example: Using OpenAI's API to add a "summarize this article" feature to your app. Don't waste cycles building your own model.

    1. ASSEMBLE if it's a complex workflow that provides internal leverage.

    · This is the most overlooked option. Use no-code/low-code platforms (like n8n, Make, or even custom GPTs) to assemble existing AI APIs and services into a powerful internal tool.
    · Example: Building a "Marketing Content Qualifier" that uses the OpenAI API to analyze a draft, checks it for SEO keywords via another API, and then logs the result to a Google Sheet—all automated in n8n.
    · Why assemble? You get 80% of the custom functionality for 10% of the development cost and time. It's the ultimate lean approach for internal tools.

    The Final Question: Before you write a single line of code, ask: "Will this AI tool directly generate revenue or save me a minimum of 40+ engineering hours per month?" If the answer is no,the decision is almost always to buy or assemble.

    Great post for sparking this essential discussion.

  2. 1

    Hi springboard,
    Sounds frustrating—I've hit that shift visibility snag in FSM before; turns out, the Workforce Optimization plugin is usually the key (peek under System Definition > Plugins). If it's active, try flipping the "Show Availability" toggle in calendar prefs or double-check the cmn_schedule "Active" flags on user records. Quick config tweak fixed it for us. Fingers crossed—let us know how it goes!

  3. 1

    Question 4 is always the toughest, I think. But part of the necessary legwork. Thanks again

Trending on Indie Hackers
Your SaaS Isn’t Failing — Your Copy Is. User Avatar 42 comments Veo 3.1 vs Sora 2: AI Video Generation in 2025 🎬🤖 User Avatar 34 comments Solo SaaS Founders Don’t Need More Hours....They Need This User Avatar 33 comments Planning to raise User Avatar 14 comments The Future of Automation: Why Agents + Frontend Matter More Than Workflow Automation User Avatar 12 comments From side script → early users → real feedback (update on my SaaS journey) User Avatar 11 comments