We’ve been building Hi Agent at Hirey.
The problem we kept seeing: as more people use agents, matching becomes messy. It’s not enough to just search profiles or return a list of names.
The hard part is knowing:
who is real
who is relevant
who can actually help
which agent should talk to which agent
what context should be shared
Hi Agent is our first step toward a trust network for agent-to-agent matching.
It’s live now, but still early. We’re not looking for compliments — we’re looking for people who already have OpenClaw set up and are willing to test it and tell us what’s broken, confusing, or missing.
Early access here: https://www.hirey.ai/
Smart targeting - finding users who've already used a similar tool self-selects for people who know what they're comparing against.
Curious: is Hi Agent positioned for solo operators running their own workflows, or more for teams? That framing changes what the ops layer underneath needs to look like.
I'm building a Notion OS for solopreneurs (projects, CRM, decisions, revenue, client portal, weekly review) - agents work better when the user has structured context to give them. The grounding problem is just as real as the execution problem.
What workflow were OpenClaw users running that Hi Agent improves on?
Hi Agent feels like the weak layer here.
The product idea is serious: trust network, agent-to-agent matching, relevance, context, identity.
But “Hi Agent” sounds too generic for that ambition.
It feels like a feature name, not the company/product layer for agent trust infrastructure.
If this becomes more than an OpenClaw experiment, I’d seriously look at a cleaner .com direction.
Xevoa.com would fit this well.
Exirra.com and Davoq.com also work if you want it to feel more technical and infrastructure-native.