Show IH: WeProcess. Integrated platform or another all-in-one stretched too thin?
Show IH: WeProcess. Free plan, English UI, link below.
The bet: most great work stands on someone else's prior work, but our tools force us to rebuild from scratch. Newton's "shoulders of giants" framed as a product.
The shape: one platform covering ideation (whiteboard, mind map) → execution (kanban, Gantt, burndown) → sharing (public boards, knowledge share) → monetization (template marketplace, authors earn points convertible to cash). Same content across all four stages.
Most tools cover one stage well. Notion does docs and lists. Asana does execution. Miro does canvas. WeProcess tries to cover the whole arc, with a marketplace layer that rewards people who give other founders a shoulder to stand on.
What I can't judge from inside: does that read as "integrated platform with a real philosophy" or as "another all-in-one tool stretched too thin"?
Mentioned earlier this week I was stuck in pre-launch polish. Taking the advice. Launching before feeling ready.
Link: weprocess.jp
Reads welcome, blunt ones especially.
The integrated platform bet works when data flows seamlessly across all four stages—that's what separates 'one tool with many tabs' from a real platform. The actual test: can a founder see which ideation templates led to the highest-completion kanban projects, and have those surface automatically in the marketplace rankings? If that cross-stage data loop exists, you have a genuine flywheel that Notion and Miro can't replicate. Most all-in-ones fail because each feature stores data in isolation rather than feeding insights back across the workflow. Think about that architecture early—it's much harder to retrofit. I work with SaaS founders on exactly this kind of cross-module data architecture, and it's usually the thing that determines whether 'integrated' is a real claim or just marketing. Free SQL diagnostic scripts here if you're figuring out your reporting layer → https://growthwithshehroz.gumroad.com/l/psmqnx
The “whole arc” idea is stronger than the current name.
WeProcess sounds descriptive, but it makes the product feel like another workflow tool.
What you’re actually describing is bigger: a system for turning prior work into reusable execution assets.
That needs a name with more product gravity if you want people to see it as a platform, not a bundled feature set.
Xevoa.com or Beryxa.com would fit this direction much better.
Xevoa feels strongest for an integrated work/execution platform.
Beryxa works if you want it to feel more polished and SaaS-native.