Solo founder, been shipping Claude tooling for 3 months. Got tired ofReddit posts claiming "this one prompt changes everything" without any

This is solid — especially calling out placebo.

But right now it still reads like:
→ “better prompts”

Which puts you in the same bucket you’re arguing against.

The real angle here is:
→ “prompt performance, measured — not guessed”

That’s a different category.

If people don’t instantly see:
“this helps me avoid wasting time on fake wins”
they’ll treat it like another prompt library.

Also — if you push this into a real product, the name/brand will need to carry that credibility.

Happy to share a few directions if you go that route.

The 47% placebo rate is a useful number to lead with because it reframes the conversation from 'which prompts work' to 'most shared prompts are useless and here is how I proved it.' The controlled A/B methodology is the actual differentiator here, not the cheat sheet itself. Curious what the distribution looked like across the 120 tests. Did the 53% that showed real effect cluster around specific prompt categories, or was it spread across types?