so here's where i'm at. i've been trying to narrow down a micro saas idea for about three weeks now — that's roughly 38 hours if i'm being honest with myself — and every time i think i've found something solid, i talk myself out of it. not because the idea is bad, but because i can't figure out if the market is too small or if i'm just scared of building something people won't pay for.
i keep going in circles with the same three sources: trending threads on r/SideProject, the indie hackers feed, and a spreadsheet i've been building since march. the spreadsheet was my friend's idea and honestly it's become a bit of a mess. i found 11 ideas that seemed promising, narrowed it down to 4, and now i'm stuck at the same wall every time: is this too niche or is niche actually good for micro saas?
i keep reading that you should validate before building but nobody seems to agree on what validation actually looks like when you don't have an audience yet.
so my actual question is this: does anyone have a process for getting past the idea evaluation phase without actually building something? i keep feeling like i need to commit before i have proof, which feels backwards. how are you handling that tension with your micro saas ideas?
I think you're framing this as a research problem when it's actually a commitment problem — the validation everyone preaches assumes you have distribution, which as a no-audience solo dev you don't. What worked for me on my current side project: I picked the idea I'd be willing to keep working on for 6 months even if it made $0, then shipped the smallest useful slice in 2 weeks and let real search traffic tell me which features were the actual market. 38 hours of spreadsheet research never beats 38 hours of a live URL collecting organic clicks. Pick the one of your 4 ideas you'd genuinely use yourself and ship a v0.1 this week.