Over more than two decades in the startup industry, I've been exposed to hundreds of ideas and ventures, both as a founder myself and through accelerators I was involved with. Unfortunately, I discovered that the success rate of these ventures is very low, not because the ideas were bad, but since the founders didn't listen to the market and came out with a product they thought the market needed. On top of that, they fail to build an initial user base before launching the product,ending with a huge and complex product launch efforts
Idea owners fail at proper product planning mainly in the early stages. They skip getting feedback from potential customers, don't take the time to truly understand users' pain points, and never go through a proper process to define the product. Even when they do manage to reach potential customers, in most cases the feedback they get is worthless. "The product is nice" or "looks awesome" isn't information you can draw real insights from about how the product should actually work.
About two years ago I started building StartZig around this exact problem. It's a community based app where idea owners help each other by giving structured feedback on their product plans, feedback that can actually be analyzed into real insights about the product's direction. Founders support founders. Along the way, some community members turn into the first users of these ideas, and end up supporting each other's success.
The app offers tools and a structured process for defining a product: building a demo, defining features and building a customer base. By the end of the journey, the founder reaches the beta testing stage with a properly defined product and an initial group of customers already in place.
Would love to hear what you think.
If you're pre-idea or early-stage, would something like this actually help you, or is the real blocker somewhere else entirely?
What's the one thing you wish someone had walked you through before you built your first version?
The structured-feedback angle is interesting because “people like it” rarely tells a founder what to change. Turning feedback into something actionable, while also helping build an initial group of users around the product, makes the workflow more useful than a typical feedback community.
Thanks for this . Honestly a sharper way of putting it than I managed myself! Mind if I quote that line ('turning feedback into something actionable...') on the StartZig site? Happy to credit you and link to your profile.
Absolutely, happy to. You can credit me as Aryan Sinh and link to my profile.
cheers