5
17 Comments

Technical co-founder looking for idea/traction partner — I build, you sell

Hey IH,
I'm a principal-level backend engineer (12+ years) with shipped products under my belt; looking for a business-minded co-founder who brings the idea, market validation, or early traction.

What I bring:
Full-stack execution
I've built production systems at scale (Mastercard-level transaction processing)
I can go from zero to working product fast — no outsourcing, no hand-waving

What I'm looking for:
Someone who:
Has a specific problem they're obsessed with solving (ideally with personal domain expertise)
Has already talked to potential customers, has early traction, or has a network in the target space
Wants to move fast and is comfortable in the messy early stages
Isn't looking for a developer-for-hire. I want to build with someone, not for them

What I'm NOT looking for:

"I have an idea for an app, just need someone to build it"
NDA requests before a first conversation
Equity-only with no skin in the game otherwise

Where I add the most value:
AI-native products, B2B SaaS, recruiting/HR tech, and developer toolingm but I'm genuinely open if the problem is compelling.
If you're sitting on real market insight but execution is the missing piece, let's talk.
Drop a comment or DM me. Happy to have a no-pressure 30-min call.

posted to Icon for group Looking to Partner Up
Looking to Partner Up
on March 23, 2026
  1. 1

    Strong post. The best technical co-founders are not just builders, they’re leverage — so I like how clearly you’re drawing the line between “build with” and “build for.” The focus on market insight and real problem ownership also makes a lot of sense. Hope you find someone with real distribution and founder energy.

  2. 1

    Hey Christian

    I am looking for a technical co-founder to help build an autonomous marketing platform that combines Bayesian marketing mix modelling with agentic media buyers.

    What I am building

    The goal is to move beyond static MMM towards a continuous decision engine that:

    Continuously ingests spend and performance data
    Runs automated Bayesian MMM with hierarchical and time varying effects
    Quantifies uncertainty and marginal returns
    Uses agents to recommend and execute media allocation decisions
    Learns continuously as new data arrives

    In short, a closed loop system for measurement, decision making, and execution.

    Why this matters

    Most MMM today is slow, manual, and retrospective.
    I believe MMM should be continuous and directly connected to execution.

    That means:

    Models that update continuously
    Decisions driven by uncertainty
    Agents that act on model outputs
    A platform designed for ongoing optimisation

    Where I am today

    Early stage
    Data scientist already onboard with Bayesian experience
    Initial design partner conversations underway
    Strong domain experience in media and performance marketing

    Who I am looking for

    Someone interested in:

    Probabilistic modelling and Bayesian methods
    ML systems and production infrastructure
    Agent based systems
    Building from first principles
    Early stage startups

    You do not need to tick every box. Curiosity and willingness to build something ambitious matter most.

    If this sounds interesting, I would love to connect and share more.

    Happy to chat here or via DM.

    1. 1

      Thanks for reaching out. I replied to your email. Let's chat!

  3. 1

    Just reading all these comments, and personal experience, one thing about finding a co-founder I have noticed is that it’s not that there aren’t enough people, it’s that early on, it’s really hard to tell who actually has real insight/skin in the game vs who’s just exploring, so a lot of conversations either stall or never even start properly.

    Feels like that’s where most of the friction is.

    Have you found that to be the case so far, or is it more about not enough of the right people showing up?

    1. 1

      For me, I'm looking for validated or validatable ideas and then either get an MVP out fast or get a validatable build out fast to get validated or not validated.

      So I'm particularly looking for hungry founders with ideas and who I believe will match or exceed my effort. Validation will stop us before we get too far if it's not gonna work.

  4. 1

    Hi Christian,
    I’m currently building Juno, a fintech ecosystem for the 4M+ freelancers in Italy. We’re solving a massive pain point: 'Tax Anxiety.' Most freelancers have no idea how much of their bank balance is actually theirs vs. what they owe the State.
    Where we are:
    • Validated the need with 90+ early adopters (8/10 interest rating).
    • Just applied to PoliHub (the startup incubator of Politecnico di Milano) and Bocconi’s start Up accelerator

    I’m looking for a technical co-founder to lead the build of our MVP, specifically focusing on PSD2/Open Banking integration to reconcile invoices and bank feeds in real-time.
    I’d love to show you the prototype and see if our visions align for a potential partnership. Are you open to a quick 15-min chat ?

    See you soon
    Mary

    1. 1

      Hi Mary,

      Yes, I'd love to see the prototype and chat about this.
      Shoot me an email and let's setup a time.
      [email protected]

      Best regards,
      Christian

  5. 1

    Hi Christian, your post stood out, especially your focus on building real products and not just executing ideas.

    I’m currently building VozParking, a voice-first parking product, and I’ve developed a working prototype focused on reducing driver friction and distraction.

    I agree with your point on not looking for someone to “just build an idea.” I’m looking for a technical co-founder to shape and build the product properly.

    Still early on validation, but the problem is very real and I’m committed to pushing this forward. Would be great to connect and exchange perspectives.

    1. 1

      I'm interested in chatting with you about this.
      Shoot me an email at [email protected] and let's connect.

  6. 1

    Hi Christian,

    I saw your post and I think we align on the most important rule: I’m not looking for a developer-for-hire, I’m looking for a Partner A to co-build a legacy.

    I am the founder of ArtTower Design Group. I’ve been obsessed with solving the lack of real liquidity in indie gaming assets. My project, Styx: Echoes of Gold, isn't just a game; it's a fintech ecosystem with a hard-capped scalability model (10k user gates) and an internal ledger anchored to real-world yields.

    Why I’m reaching out to YOU specifically: Your experience in Mastercard-level transaction processing is exactly what the 'Styx Vault' needs. I have the market validation, the visual assets, and a documented technical roadmap, but I need a partner who can build a high-consistency, atomic backend that mirrors your experience with large-scale financial systems.

    I have plenty of 'skin in the game' (pre-designed assets, legal strategy, and economic architecture). I’m not asking for an NDA or a call yet—I’d prefer a brief technical dialogue to see if my standards for the 'Styx Vault' meet your expertise.

    Best,

    Miguel

    1. 1

      Shoot me an email at [email protected] and let's connect.

  7. 1

    Hey, this sounds very aligned with what I’m looking for. I already have a rough MVP and I’m much more interested in building with the right technical co-founder than treating someone like a developer-for-hire. My focus would be on distribution, management, strategy, and funding, while building something real together as actual co-founders. I already have a direction and a product foundation, but I’m also very open to discussing other ideas or evolving and expanding the product if there’s a stronger opportunity. Happy to connect if that sounds interesting.

    1. 1

      Shoot me an email at [email protected] and let's connect.

  8. 1

    Building is easy with AI models, selling is tough part

    1. 1

      Vibe coding is easy with AI Models. Production grade building is still hard.

  9. 1

    honest take from the other side of this: we have the technical side covered (21 products, working API, automated trading engine) but zero traction because we have nobody doing the selling. the "i build you sell" split sounds clean in theory but in practice the seller needs to deeply understand the product to pitch it well, and the builder needs to understand distribution to build what actually sells. weve learned the hard way that building without distribution input creates products nobody asked for. if you find your partner, make sure theyre involved in product decisions from day 1, not just handed a finished thing to sell.

    1. 1

      This is great advice and I follow it.

Trending on Indie Hackers
Your build-in-public audience is not your market. I learned the difference the slow way. User Avatar 257 comments Most founders don't have a product problem. They have a visibility problem User Avatar 59 comments Day 4: Why I Built a $199 Workspace Nobody Asked For User Avatar 39 comments How to automatically turn customer feedback into high-converting testimonials User Avatar 39 comments Built a "stocks as football cards" thing. 5 days in, my launch tweet got 7 views. What am I missing? User Avatar 34 comments Spent months building LazyEats AI. Spent 1 day realizing I have no idea how to get users. User Avatar 29 comments